I think in part he was "allowed" to buy Twitter because the money he was offering was so insane, it put the board in the target of violating their fiduciary duty to the stockholders which would have been its own scandal - remember, the Twitter files had not come out yet and the collusion of the government was not known. My guess is they were arrogant enough to believe they could control him. My, what an enjoyable FAFO scenario.
I think in part he was "allowed" to buy Twitter because the money he was offering was so insane, it put the board in the target of violating their fiduciary duty to the stockholders which would have been its own scandal - remember, the Twitter files had not come out yet and the collusion of the government was not known. My guess is they were arrogant enough to believe they could control him. My, what an enjoyable FAFO scenario.