Some folks need to consider this
(media.greatawakening.win)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (22)
sorted by:
This is going to be an unpopular opinion I'm sure, and I'm not saying they're not modifying the weather (because they are), but I don't think we should focus on the fact that patents exist for these technologies as an argument for proof that they are doing it. You can patent anything. Doesn't mean that patent is in use, or ever has been used, or is even a viable technology. A lot of people will patent an idea or design just to keep other people from coming up with the same idea. It doesn't mean that the idea works, or even that the creator has any intention of trying to develop that technology. A man in Australia patented the wheel just to prove that you could patent anything.
In one sense, I agree. Specifically, I agree that it is not proof because of what patents actually are.
But it does point to those ideas existing, and if the ideas exist then someone in government is definitely trying to develop it for their own use. Secret patents etc.
What it stokes is the unanswered curiosity, because while the patents don't prove it exists, it also doesn't prove that it doesn't.
This is also why the government should never have had carte blanche to develop hidden technologies which it has admitted to developing only after being caught red handed years later; it creates an unending distrust that is fed by being correct over and over again.
Note: I'm not really more than half a foot in on weather control, so I'm not specifically arguing that they're controlling it but just that the government is at this point Biblically evil and I would not put it past them to both find a way and try to hide it from the public.
Oh i agree. They absolutely have been working on it, and would hide it from us. And the patents do mean people have been thinking about it for a long time. But, it seems a lot of people are pointing to the patents as absolute proof, and that is just not the case. We need something more than just "patents exist" to prove that the government is actively trying to manipulate the weather.