2
Wtf_socialismreally 2 points ago +2 / -0

You are thinking in the same lines as how things have been. It either goes to 95-5% (the 4-6% brainwashed) or we lose, same ol' same ol'. The typical 50-50 system that has been historical has been controlled opposition the entire time.

Sorry, I did a bad job phrasing this. I meant "purple" in regards to having people be a little bit closer to each other in their beliefs, so people are more receptive to words and actions instead of just voting blue no matter who.

So instead of hard leftist entrenchment, we have a higher ratio of people that are willing to think critically even if it clashes with their biases.

Getting the illegals out is among the first steps to achieving this. Even a lot of the legal immigrants (my best friend lives in California and employs a lot of them) don't seem to like what has happened to their once great state.

2
Wtf_socialismreally 2 points ago +2 / -0

I'm in favor of closing down immigration in 99% of cases until we have deported at least ten million illegals and fully secured our borders.

The 1% can be a bone tossed to people who, in an internet era, are finding relationships at long distance as is sadly becoming more common but considering the younger women in the U.S. are getting closer to 10% who have OnlyFans accounts...

4
Wtf_socialismreally 4 points ago +4 / -0

You're not wrong but California has a rot that has to be excised, because it is entrenched. It goes beyond illegals.

If we could get that ever closer to a 50% purple though, that would give us a much better fighting chance in the future. Not to mention getting rid of illegals would immediately change how much pull California has over the rest of the country.

2
Wtf_socialismreally 2 points ago +2 / -0

Well, he seems to have succeeded on that at least. So maybe she did her job.

He'll never convince me that she was the best and only choice for that mission though.

1
Wtf_socialismreally 1 point ago +1 / -0

You are projecting that I "came out of the woodwork" when you're effectively a newborn baby. You don't even attempt to address that, you just deflect. You don't even address the point I was making, because you have no intelligent response.

You are textbook, and you're delusional. We're done.

1
Wtf_socialismreally 1 point ago +1 / -0

What the fuck kind of point are you even trying to make here?

Elon isn't Trump. I didn't say he was. They are saying two completely different things.

Elon is saying Trump is on the Epstein list; the leftists go wild and start demanding the release. Narratives pop up here talking about how it's kayfabe and that it's explicitly for this purpose that Elon and Trump had a spat.

Now Trump is saying to move on; the leftists go wild and start demanding the release. Narratives pop up here talking about how it's kayfabe and that it's explicitly for this purpose that Trump is saying to move on.

Both of these did the same thing, only one thing pissed off more people on our own side that wants to see justice. If the outcome is the same (leftists demanding the release of the list) then what is the actual effective difference?

Using words doesn't make someone an NPC

Using the same words as another person where not appropriate ("coming out of the woodwork" as if you have functionally any karma whatsoever, and that's the metric they wanted to use? Laughable) is what makes you an NPC. Same as the left always spewing the same things each of them say.

but you projecting shows you are.

You have 27 pages of comments on this forum. I have 679 pages of comments on this forum.

Who's "coming out of the woodwork" exactly?

1
Wtf_socialismreally 1 point ago +1 / -0

However, I'm not out here saying it's the straw that broke the camels back

I didn't either? I guess you and him can't read for shit.

I asked what was different between this and the last time this narrative was playing out when Elon pulled his bullshit.

woodwork

NPC.

1
Wtf_socialismreally 1 point ago +1 / -0

The little bitch accused me of that and I have 2.5x his total engagement, but they only ever care about the score that they have more of. Barely any of his posts even cracked 100 anyway, he just no-lifes them. Yay? Because everyone should be just like that!

Yes, he has set me off and yes I am actually pissed at those retarded accusations.

2
Wtf_socialismreally 2 points ago +2 / -0

That's what you and the media treat it like. A cult.

I stood against this narrative for the last 8 years, loudly in public, on Reddit, on Twitter, wherever I could.

But when people like you, like others on Patriots and GGRockz accept no criticism, frustration or anything with ANYTHING Trump says or does, you are quacking like a fucking duck.

I have been far more active than most of you in the past, but because of I don't farm fucking post karma because I don't want to live my life trawling mainstream media, I am now a "bot, a shill, etc."

No fuck off and eat shit with that bullshit.

We spent years criticizing the left for ejecting everyone who didn't agree with literally 100% of their agenda, and now our side is doing the same thing.

I'm not letting go of Epstein, I spent a very large amount of time on the Pizzagate sub and Voat looking through shit and finding connections, this is one of the most important things to me and BITCHES WILL NOT SHOUT ME DOWN OVER IT.

1
Wtf_socialismreally 1 point ago +1 / -0

This is irrelevant to what I said.

The narrative was that Elon and Trump were doing kayfabe and this same narrative played out after that, "they're asking for them to release the files!"

So why is it different now?

0
Wtf_socialismreally 0 points ago +1 / -1

You keep copy and pasting this. I have more total karma than you, shit for brains.

I am tired of the filthy sycophants like you.

2
Wtf_socialismreally 2 points ago +2 / -0

If you are not made to learn the truth, you are doomed to follow in the footsteps of those who failed before you.

1
Wtf_socialismreally 1 point ago +1 / -0

I'd rather team up with a dog. Because the dog is able to be trained to know right from wrong.

4
Wtf_socialismreally 4 points ago +5 / -1

They did this when Elon said he was on it. What's different now except it has pissed off people on his own side this time?

5
Wtf_socialismreally 5 points ago +5 / -0

I'm not done with Trump, but I am absolutely pissed off at him for this and I'm not letting it go unless there's a win on that front.

10
Wtf_socialismreally 10 points ago +10 / -0

So it's okay for Flynn to be frustrated, but not any voters. That's what I'm starting to grasp.

1
Wtf_socialismreally 1 point ago +1 / -0

I mean, Purkiss has invested far more into Trump than 99% of people on these boards. Heavens be he doesn't immediately discard Elon, especially while Trump has been going off the fuckin' walls right now.

3
Wtf_socialismreally 3 points ago +3 / -0

He should pay the salaries for the day of every other member of Congress out of his own pocket.

4
Wtf_socialismreally 4 points ago +4 / -0

I'd still consider it worth it if we took 100B from military and put it into ICE for a few years.

Nearly 1T is an insane and unfathomably large number that people are desensitized to, because if one were to see it in person in the largest dollar denomination we have they wouldn't believe what they were seeing.

1
Wtf_socialismreally 1 point ago +1 / -0

Cabal? All bad.

Trannies? Nah, not all bad. 95%+ of them sorely misled and groomed, and a significant portion of them are bad.

Some are still the old type of tranny, who don't announce it and make a spectacle of themselves, and aren't autogynephiliacs. Those aren't intrinsically bad, and those I do feel sorry for when the other 95%+ are out here making everyone hate them.

For real though, Brigitte is definitely in line A or B+A, but definitely not C.

view more: Next ›