4
Wtf_socialismreally 4 points ago +4 / -0

Immediate thoughts. Gonna take more than that to convince me that this isn't hopeful grandstanding.

1
Wtf_socialismreally 1 point ago +1 / -0

Not exercising the right and duty to vote is definitely not the way.

You can believe it's not going to matter, you can believe they'll just steal it and defraud the American people.

But the fight still continues, and backing down just because you believe it's bleak is not the way to win.

Not when Trump is on the ballot, anyway.

4
Wtf_socialismreally 4 points ago +4 / -0

Perhaps that's a demoralization tactic.

They had no intention of making her win...just laying out sandbags across the battlefield.

Unfortunately for them, Trump is a nimble navigator and Biden, well...he already tried to kickbox a sandbag and lost.

3
Wtf_socialismreally 3 points ago +3 / -0

"You didn't fill out this ballot in exactly the right way, so even though you thought you voted Trump/MAGA we adjudicated and ensured your vote was properly counted for who we intend to select.

Thank you for your continued support of our Free™️ And™️ Fair™️, Most Secure Elections©️"

5
Wtf_socialismreally 5 points ago +5 / -0

That there are "different versions" seems like an attempt to poison the well, to me anyway.

6
Wtf_socialismreally 6 points ago +6 / -0

You know, I really do get tired of dealing with Catholic ideologies.

At least Christianity doesn't have a centralized church known for its debauchery and corruption under someone who literally calls themselves the voice and will of God himself.

Christianity is better in so many ways.

1
Wtf_socialismreally 1 point ago +1 / -0

Turning it into "All Lives Matter" vs "Black Lives Matter" determines the judge is still compromised.

All Lives Matter is racially and sexually inclusive in all angles; it's only because they wanted to turn it into a "gotcha, evil bigot!" that they pushed so hard on that.

2
Wtf_socialismreally 2 points ago +2 / -0

Turns out breaking a company up doesn't work if you then just let them continuously re-expand into a larger and even worse company before the break up.

So funny how unevenly those rulings are handed out. Almost like some protection money is tossed their way.

2
Wtf_socialismreally 2 points ago +2 / -0

Very little cash ends up going back to the city/state/country anyway.

Most of it goes into pockets of the politicians, their families and friends (through "contracts"), pet projects or to sustain unnecessary government spending (e.g. "affordable housing", where people on welfare get all sorts of benefits while they then go on to terrorize their neighborhood).

One of the most successful gaslight campaigns in history, I think, is convincing people that there needs to be direct taxation on all of these things in order to fund run down roads.

2
Wtf_socialismreally 2 points ago +2 / -0

All taxation is theft, but there's a special kind of theft on taxing something you already own.

1
Wtf_socialismreally 1 point ago +1 / -0

I have been vocally critical of certain aspects, but we keep the story straight. Sure, some people might try to do some very special gymnastics to try and make a story fit, but no one is out there saying clothes are blue when they're actually red.

3
Wtf_socialismreally 3 points ago +3 / -0

Regardless, even if Elon were to somehow turn on us later, dethroning the current machine is only a positive.

So long as we gain the ability to break free, we can at least resist for a time even in the face of betrayal.

1
Wtf_socialismreally 1 point ago +1 / -0

Well, it's supposed to anyway.

Perhaps it gave too much leeway to the judicial branch (e.g. SCOTUS rulings) to legislate from the bench. The Constitution was not supposed to be reinterpreted for the purpose of making law.

1
Wtf_socialismreally 1 point ago +1 / -0

The idea of paying politicians' wages for their entire lives is way too much financial security for these people, especially since they literally vote for their own salaries.

Literally no other job on the planet does that, there is zero benefit.

1
Wtf_socialismreally 1 point ago +1 / -0

By applying the ruling's punitive action to his children, they set it up for an easy appeal.

It will look very partisan if they shut that appeal down.

view more: Next ›