It's always (d)ifferent for them. Their arguments change like the weather, and as volatile as an active volcano amidst an earthquake or a neutron star.
Just ask them a simple hypothetical: "Climate change is fixed and Trump wins the Presidency, or Kamala wins and everything stays the same" and you'll watch them trip over themselves to rationalize why Kamala must win.
Because it's not about that. It's a talking point that they were conditioned to regurgitate at any cost.
It's always (d)ifferent for them. Their arguments change like the weather, and as volatile as an active volcano amidst an earthquake or a neutron star.
Just ask them a simple hypothetical: "Climate change is fixed and Trump wins the Presidency, or Kamala wins and everything stays the same" and you'll watch them trip over themselves to rationalize why Kamala must win.
Because it's not about that. It's a talking point that they were conditioned to regurgitate at any cost.