Assistance in responding with assets with potential for lethality, or any situation
in which it is reasonably foreseeable that providing the requested assistance may involve the use
of force that is likely to result in lethal force, including death or serious bodily injury. It also
includes all support to civilian law enforcement officials in situations where a confrontation
between civilian law enforcement and civilian individuals or groups is reasonably anticipated.
Such use of force must be in accordance with DoDD 5210.56, potentially as further restricted
based on the specifics of the requested support.
Even if this is the case,reading the other document that you are referring to states in the section on the use of deadly force:
"Deadly force may only be used when reasonable, including, but not limited to, under the following circumstances:
(f) Performing an arrest or apprehension, or preventing escape. Authorized DoD
personnel may use deadly force to arrest, apprehend, or prevent the unlawful escape of a fleeing
subject if there is probable cause to believe:
The subject has committed an offense involving the infliction or threatened
infliction of serious physical injury or death; and
The escape of the subject would pose an actual or imminent threat of death or
serious bodily harm to DoD personnel or others in the vicinity."
This is stated in 3.4 (USE OF FORCE IN THE PERFORMANCE OF OFFICIAL DUTIES. ). e 4 (f) (pages 17 & 18)
My interpretation of this combined with the new Directive is that the DoD may use deadly force if they perceive you to be a threat and fleeing the scene. (To me this will be used as the excuse to start shooting us when we have the election stolen from us a second time and we go to protest. There will be a false flag and the Commies will authorize the DoD to take us out.
I can see that you're right about the authorization, but you must also take into consideration that the current Administration is full of Traitors. Llyod Austin is one of them. Do you really think he would hesitate to authorize deadly force against us Patriots?
If authorized by the DoD they will shoot you, and they will use the excuse of political violence to engage you with deadly force while teamed with normal cops/sheriffs.
Maybe I'm misunderstanding your levels of ' deadly force?' My interpretation is they are referring to the Military, National Guard etcetera.
There's a big difference to being engaged by Cops, Sheriffs, etcetera vs trained military men armed with a much more deadly arsenal and set of skills.
This would be the reason I think it's a "big deal" when they authorize deadly force to our Military against Us while 'assisting' L.E.
I don't know how you came to the conclusion that "it doesn't matter because they are already doing it." From my understanding this new Directive expands upon the rules authorizing force against a civilian, or groups of civilians at the behest of the DoD. Normally this would be foreign combatants, terrorists, etcetera.
This corrupt administration and our compromised Congress have been conducting concocted schemes similar to this for a long time. Stacking bills that don't do anything initially, but then they interconnect to other bills and suddenly the combination of these new rules screws the people. This just seems to be another instance of the same, yet much more alarming considering the political climate and our shared enemies. (The Cabal/Deep State)
Page 13: 3.3 a c:
Assistance in responding with assets with potential for lethality, or any situation in which it is reasonably foreseeable that providing the requested assistance may involve the use of force that is likely to result in lethal force, including death or serious bodily injury. It also includes all support to civilian law enforcement officials in situations where a confrontation
between civilian law enforcement and civilian individuals or groups is reasonably anticipated.
Such use of force must be in accordance with DoDD 5210.56, potentially as further restricted based on the specifics of the requested support.
👍 "Can we be friends?!" 😉🤣❤️
Even if this is the case,reading the other document that you are referring to states in the section on the use of deadly force: "Deadly force may only be used when reasonable, including, but not limited to, under the following circumstances: (f) Performing an arrest or apprehension, or preventing escape. Authorized DoD personnel may use deadly force to arrest, apprehend, or prevent the unlawful escape of a fleeing subject if there is probable cause to believe:
This is stated in 3.4 (USE OF FORCE IN THE PERFORMANCE OF OFFICIAL DUTIES. ). e 4 (f) (pages 17 & 18)
My interpretation of this combined with the new Directive is that the DoD may use deadly force if they perceive you to be a threat and fleeing the scene. (To me this will be used as the excuse to start shooting us when we have the election stolen from us a second time and we go to protest. There will be a false flag and the Commies will authorize the DoD to take us out.
I can see that you're right about the authorization, but you must also take into consideration that the current Administration is full of Traitors. Llyod Austin is one of them. Do you really think he would hesitate to authorize deadly force against us Patriots?
https://www.esd.whs.mil/Portals/54/Documents/DD/issuances/dodd/521056p.PDF?ver=PIvIb3eht0obgolnD0UCEw%3d%3d
(Sorry about the late reply I was at work)
If authorized by the DoD they will shoot you, and they will use the excuse of political violence to engage you with deadly force while teamed with normal cops/sheriffs.
Maybe I'm misunderstanding your levels of ' deadly force?' My interpretation is they are referring to the Military, National Guard etcetera.
There's a big difference to being engaged by Cops, Sheriffs, etcetera vs trained military men armed with a much more deadly arsenal and set of skills.
This would be the reason I think it's a "big deal" when they authorize deadly force to our Military against Us while 'assisting' L.E.
I don't know how you came to the conclusion that "it doesn't matter because they are already doing it." From my understanding this new Directive expands upon the rules authorizing force against a civilian, or groups of civilians at the behest of the DoD. Normally this would be foreign combatants, terrorists, etcetera.
This corrupt administration and our compromised Congress have been conducting concocted schemes similar to this for a long time. Stacking bills that don't do anything initially, but then they interconnect to other bills and suddenly the combination of these new rules screws the people. This just seems to be another instance of the same, yet much more alarming considering the political climate and our shared enemies. (The Cabal/Deep State)