What reason was given for suspending the student on the receiving end? That's ridiculous. When my boys were in school, students in a fight were suspended and even if they were DEFENDING themselves, got suspended. But EVERYONE involved got a suspension. Didn't look like the chick on the ground was even defending herself.
It’s like the seven-on-one race attacks: the admins call it a “fight” rather than an assault or ambush. Anyone caught “fighting” gets suspended. Much cleaner for the admins.
What reason was given for suspending the student on the receiving end? That's ridiculous. When my boys were in school, students in a fight were suspended and even if they were DEFENDING themselves, got suspended. But EVERYONE involved got a suspension. Didn't look like the chick on the ground was even defending herself.
It’s like the seven-on-one race attacks: the admins call it a “fight” rather than an assault or ambush. Anyone caught “fighting” gets suspended. Much cleaner for the admins.
I might buy that if the aggressor in this instance was also suspended; however, they were not.