The Balfour Declaration
"Dear Lord Rothschild:
I have much pleasure in conveying to you, on behalf of His Majesty's Government, the following declaration of sympathy with Jewish Zionist aspirations which has been submitted to, and approved by, the Cabinet:
His Majesty's Government view with favor the establishment in Palestine of a national home for the Jewish people, and will use their best endeavors to facilitate the achievement of this object, it being clearly understood that nothing shall be done which may prejudice the civil and religious rights of existing non- Jewish communities in Palestine, or the rights and political status enjoyed by Jews in any other country.
I should be grateful if you would bring this declaration to the knowledge of the Zionist Federation.
Yours,
Arthur James Balfour"
This letter to Lord Rothschild, by the British Foreign Secretary Arthur James Balfour, was aimed at Jewish support for the Allies in the First World War. The letter, known as *the "Balfour Declaration" became the basis movement to create a Jewish state in Palestine. The letter was published a week later in The Times of London,
Foreign Office November 2nd, 1917
WHO do/did the Rothschilds worship?
For or against humanity?
Thinking logically?
I personally couldn't care less about other's opinions, but it really chaps my ass to see Digital Soldiers, whose assignment it is the THINK LOGICALLY, taking positions that they clearly have not thought all the way through.
Few talk about God here more than I do.
This is not the 'Israel' of the Bible as you know it.
Now friends you're either awake, you're a shill, or you're still asleep. Which is it?
'[Israel] for last.'
If you don't know how to down-vote this post let me help…
Click the bars at the top left.
Click settings.
Set "community styling" to "off".
Click "SAVE" at the bottom.
WWG1WGA!
Edit: the entire point is that if you support the political Zionists, you are supporting a construct that is inseparable from the Rothschilds.
Doesn't make sense. Got to go much deeper than such things.
Oh, Jesus. That's so damned difficult to find. I've been searching around for a long time, through thousands of docs, hundreds and hundreds of hours. Good luck. A tiny bit that got me really upset: long ago, my sis went to Germany (I have relatives there, I'm half German half Danish) to "learn" German, she taught HS German. She assembled a 'family history' during her time there, from the stories relatives told. That 'history' indicated that ONE, only ONE, of the family was a "nazi". Much later, several decades, a family member started a page on f b (and a website) dedicated to family members. Only traceable bloodlines were allowed membership. Strangely enough, after a few months of existence on f b, members began to appear, fully vetted bloodlines/descendants, who were born in South America, some with Spanish names, all descendants of Germans who "migrated" to S.A. AFTER Operation Barbarossa. Some of those relatives indicated that they had, as children, been witnesses to Hitler living in S. A., both during the last part of the war and post war. This whole thing started my deep dig into WWII etc, more than 12 years ago. It was quite a shock, rattled my foundations deeply.
In my digging, I've found stuff such as the Unetice. These were central/northern Europe, primarily Germanic, a civilization with quite advanced metalworking, building and such. These date back approximately 4,000 years. They did beautiful work, artistic, very craftsman. Danes/Swedes apparently are close relatives. The Vikings (of which my mother was very proud) have been treated by "history" as gross, vulgar, dirty, always warring peoples. In fact, the Vikes were extremely clean, quite civilized, very 'scientific', and among the best navigators the world had ever seen. I'm inclined to think that they, among others, had an influence on American Indians, due to the tribes (many) that sported blonde hair and blue eyes, another item you won't see in popular history.
Yeah, I'm inclined to think the 'historians' are master liars.