But Why?
(media.greatawakening.win)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (130)
sorted by:
Very very good question. Logically their is something in the milk that is beneficial that is killed off by pasteurization.
It's probably better than ivermectin,since they figured this out a long time ago,with poor instruments it had to be huge.
My guess is that unpasteurized milk contains all of the minerals, vitamins, antibodies, and bacteria needed to establish your micro biome and gut health.
They hate ivermectin because it immediately wipes out decades of effort to encourage parasite infestation in the populace. Similarly, they hate unpasteurized milk because it will allow people to restore their full digestive health in less than a week.
Excellent deduction. I was thinking similar, particularly given the decades of analysis and commentary from diverse quarters claiming Pasteur was a fraud and charlatan. It is not outwith the realms of possibility to me now that he was a Democide Inc lackey in a cohort tasked with devising de-nourishment assault vectors making otherwise healthy human foodstuffs unhealthy. See also: intensive farming, pesticides, wheat frankenscience, fluoride in drinking water, sugars and syrups in everything, hydroponics, soil poisoning, processed foods, GMOs etc…
Are you saying hydroponic vegetables are bad?
If by bad you mean “zero nutrition”, then yes. This is not to say hydroponics isn’t nor can’t be used to supercharge vegetables nutritionally, albeit artificially, but that’s not what happens in large scale production. The Netherlands supplies many European supermarkets with most of their vegetables but the quality and nutritional value is famously next to non-existent compared with what soil and sun can produce, alas at much less quantities. Tasteless, water heavy, mineral deficient facsimiles at best.
Awesome for growing mindbending unnaturally high THC superweeds concocted by deviant botanists, though, if that’s still your thing.