That is likely far from accurate. More like 70 for Trump and 20 for Harris. That poll show 98.3% total. We know that there are undecided unaccounted for. All polls showing Harris even slightly ahead are bogus. As is most of the Harris support on X.
I was thinking about this yesterday. There is a Q post that talks about how polls that are overly optimistic or pessimistic can suppress voter turnout.
If you think your candidate is way ahead you might rationalize not voting. Similarly, if you think your candidate is hopelessly behind, you might skip voting.
Maybe the most accurate pollster is also careful to not be accused of conducting a suppression poll.
That is likely far from accurate. More like 70 for Trump and 20 for Harris. That poll show 98.3% total. We know that there are undecided unaccounted for. All polls showing Harris even slightly ahead are bogus. As is most of the Harris support on X.
I was thinking about this yesterday. There is a Q post that talks about how polls that are overly optimistic or pessimistic can suppress voter turnout.
If you think your candidate is way ahead you might rationalize not voting. Similarly, if you think your candidate is hopelessly behind, you might skip voting.
Maybe the most accurate pollster is also careful to not be accused of conducting a suppression poll.
I think their polls are totally fake. Harris isn't close. I doubt she's within 30% of Trump. Yet mainstream media reports the votes.