https://quoththeraven.substack.com/p/they-are-scrubbing-the-internet-right
. . . It’s not always about being censored or not. Today’s algorithms include a range of tools that affect searchability and findability. For example, the Joe Rogan interview with Donald Trump racked up an astonishing 34 million views before YouTube and Google tweaked their search engines to make it hard to discover, while even presiding over a technical malfunction that disabled viewing for many people. Faced with this, Rogan went to the platform X to post all three hours.
Navigating this thicket of censorship and quasi-censorship has become part of the business model of alternative media.
Those are just the headline cases. Beneath the headlines, there are technical events taking place that are fundamentally affecting the ability of any historian even to look back and tell what is happening. Incredibly, the service Archive.org which has been around since 1994 has stopped taking images of content on all platforms. For the first time in 30 years, we have gone a long swath of time – since October 8-10 – since this service has chronicled the life of the Internet in real time.
(more)
Thanks, there is a lot of info there. If I could add to this?
https://freespoke.com/
https://presearch.io/
https://4get.ca/
https://search.fuckoffgoogle.net/
https://search.joshwho.net/
http://pdfyes.com/
https://udm14.com/
https://www.bullmask.com/
Thank you!
It's worth noting that even search engines which appear to be less biased aren't always -- compare the two searches below on whether the COVID jabs are "safe and effective" --
https://search.fuckoffgoogle.net/?q=Are%20the%20COVID%20vaccines%20safe%20and%20effective%3F&categories=general&language=en-US
https://yandex.com/search/?text=Are+the+COVID+vaccines+safe+and+effective