I don't care whether he's real or an anon.
I care whether the information he posts under his name is true and I appreciate the references he posts with his articles.
You're trying to focus me on something trivial. Is the information REAL or not? THAT's the FIRST question.
The SECOND question is: why would a psyop spend time publishing the TRUTH unless -- like Q -- he was working for the Good.
The only reason I can think of is to gain the trust of an audience, only to betray it later.
Haven't seen "Frank Bergman" do that yet.
Have you?
That's fine -- the NAME alone of Slay News is enough to put some people off, but the fact that Slay covers REAL NEWS and includes LINKS to reference material, including actual studies, is the point: Slay is an example of someone putting together a site for REAL NEWS, and having someone here (VaccinesCauseSIDS, who generally posts solid material) slander them without sauce -- because there ISN'T any so far as I know -- really pisses me off. Especially since it's in part a slander of Makis, who reposts Slay regularly.
Recent example:
https://makismd.substack.com/p/news-dutch-scientists-expose-fake
which is a repost of https://slaynews.com/news/dutch-scientists-expose-fake-data-death-rates-among-covid-vaxxed/
which includes this link:
I understand your viewpoint, Olddogg, and there's an argument for it, although the argument includes whether the State has the right to regulate (in this case) longlines in the ocean.
In August 2020, the pair of divers came across the longline connected to a buoy about three miles off Jupiter Inlet and, believing it to be illegal, cut it, freeing the apex predators and grouper in the process, according to court documents.
The men reported their actions to state wildlife officials and brought the line back to shore – but were later hit with federal charges and ultimately found guilty by a jury two years later.
“In our mind, the entire time, we thought we were uncovering a crime rather than committing a crime,” Mansell said.
Now, I'd actually prefer that a market (i.e., civil society) organization, like the original Underwriter's Labs or the National Fire Safety Association do such things, but either way, such things must be done if we don't want the tragedy of the commons to become a normal state of affairs.
The pardonees (is that a word?) THOUGHT they were releasing animals that had been illegally and cruelly snagged on a longline (and it IS cruel, whether it's legal or not). Maybe they should have been punished, but not NEARLY as harshly as they were. So I'm glad Trump pardoned them; the punishment here did NOT fit the crime in my view.
So: just my opinion.
Great point.
Sane, decent people of goodwill -- regardless of their religion or lack thereof -- need to participate in politics to some extent and in whatever fashion they feel is right. Ignoring politics makes for a simpler and easier life, but leads to tyranny.
Coercive governance is an unfair system -- forcing actions (including prohibiting actions that don't violate natural law) is Evil, and even America as envisioned by the Founders did that to some degree, despite our being a Republic with (on paper) limited government power -- and I'm not just talking about outright slavery.
I'd love a truly civil society, where everything from law enforcement and corporate regulation to national defense was market-based, because the best alternative is what we already have: a small, restrained government that becomes a bloated tyranny and globe-spanning, war-mongering Empire. NOT what the Founders wanted, but as Franklin hinted, exactly what was most likely to happen. ("A Republic, if you can keep it").
As long as we allow the Ring of Power to remain in this world, we need to be vigilant against it's constant corrupting influence. That means we must actively oppose Evil, and particularly Evil becoming exponentially more powerful by seizing government's coercive power. Nearly every problem in modern-day America (and around the world) stems from THAT.
Oddly, Bergman articles at "Slay News" (and articles by other authors) contain verifiable links, while your post provides none, and no sauce whatsoever.
Dr. Makis often reposts Slaynews articles, and I often post about them here.
The thing is, I don't just blindly do that. I follow the links in the article AS I READ IT before posting about it.
Below are just three random examples of Makis posting Slay News articles; all of them slam the psyop of the COVID "vaccine" bioweapons. All have links you can follow -- and I have.
If Slay News is a psyop, they've gone to incredible effort, creating websites for scientific journals among other things.
My guess is that Slay News isn't a psyop. The psyop is you.
Or perhaps you encountered a psyop page yourself and believed what it said.
https://makismd.substack.com/p/news-mrna-vaccines-make-covid-symptoms
https://makismd.substack.com/p/news-who-data-covid-deaths-skyrocketed
https://makismd.substack.com/p/news-slovak-pm-robert-fico-halts
2937 is the perfect drop for this discussion, Joys1Daughter.
I especially like "This is a crossroads in the history of our civilization . . ." comment from POTUS. Gives me chills every time I read it, because the statement is absolutely true: we win this, or we lose everything. And it has to be done right. I believe that Trump and Co. are doing it the right way -- and just today we saw more evidence that America's rogue/treasonous judiciary problem is being taken care of.
Great post, Tynyyn. You (and Q) make solid points; the time for arrests IS coming, but the Main Event is still some time down the road. I suspect that even January 20, 2026 will be too early for more than a carefully selected few moderately well-known names to be hauled into court -- or a tribunal. Publicly, at least.
Before the end of this Administration, though, I think most of the Big Names will have been indicted (or convicted).
Why Q isn't AI
You give excellent reasons for that, including computational issues, but what really nails it for me is --
It doesn't have the understanding of humanity a human does.
Q is most likely a group of humans acting for the good of America and the world against the cabal. And thank god that's the case.
Exactly.
I'd not be surprised to learn that the Q team made use of an early AI for research and other tasks, but I would have a hard time believing that the entire Q oeuvre, or even a major part of it, was created by a computer program.
AI gets stuff wrong a lot because it doesn't look at the whole picture
Your post is deeply consonant with what I've read from McGilchrist about the natures of the two hemispheres. "The whole picture" is absolutely NOT something the Left hemisphere ever has grasp of; it is instead the speciality of the RIGHT hemisphere, as its grasp of context suggests. Another snipped from Ways of Attending:
Experience is forever in motion, ramifying and unpredictable. In order for us to know anything at all, that thing must have enduring properties. If all things flow and one can never step into the same river twice - Heraclitus's phrase is, I believe, a brilliant evocation of the core reality of the right hemisphere's world - one will always be taken unawares by experience: since nothing is ever being repeated, nothing can ever be known. We have to find a way of fixing it as it flies stepping back from the immediacy of experience, stepping outside the flow. Hence the brain has to attend to the world in two completely different ways, and in doing so to bring two different worlds into being. In the one, that of the right hemisphere, we experience the live, complex, embodied world of individual, always unique, beings, forever in flux, a net of interdependencies, forming and reforming wholes, a world with which we are deeply connected. In the other, that of the left hemisphere, we "experience" our experience in a special way: a "re-presented" version of it, containing now static, separable, bounded, but essentially fragmented entities, grouped into classes on which predictions can be based. This kind of attention isolates, fixes and makes each thing explicit by bringing it under the spotlight of attention. In doing so it renders things inert, mechanical, lifeless. But it also enables us for the first time to know, and consequently to learn and to make things. This gives us power. ~ ibid, p. 22
Ai is becoming more human, but not in a good way.
Yes, exactly. And that's an important insight.
One reason is that AI has no empathy. Another (and related) reason is that AI apes LEFT brain functions while having no real RIGHT brain characteristics.
Society as a whole is moving in that direction also. Not good.
If you've not encountered Iain McGilchrists's work on the divided brain, I think you'll be fascinated by it. He's written several books on the topic, including the 1500 page, two-volume The Matter With Things: Our Brains, Our Delusions, and the Unmaking of the World
A good introduction to the topic is McGilchrist's 32-page Ways of Attending: How our Divided Brain Constructs the World.
From that one:
I believe the essential difference between the right hemisphere and the left hemisphere is that the right hemisphere pays attention to the Other: to whatever it is that exists apart from ourselves, with which it sees itself in profound relation. It is deeply attracted to, and given life by, the relationship, the betweenness, that exists with this Other. By contrast, the left hemisphere pays attention to the virtual world that it has created, which is self-consistent but self-contained, ultimately disconnected from the Other, making it powerful -- but also curiously impotent, because it is ultimately only able to operate on, and to know, itself. ~ ibid, p. 23
So the meaning of an utterance begins in the right hemisphere, is made explicit (literally folded out, or unfolded) in the left, and then the whole utterance needs to be 'returned' to the right hemisphere, where it is reintegrated with all that is implicit - tone, irony, metaphor, humour, and so on, as well as a feel of the context in which the utterance is to be understood. ~ ibid, p. 29
More, from The Master and His Emissary:
The left hemisphere is not impressed by empathy: its concern is with maximising gain for itself, and its driving value is utility. ~ The Master and His Emissary, p. 145
If the detached, highly focussed attention of the left hemisphere is brought to bear on living things, and not later resolved into the whole picture by right-hemisphere attention, which yields depth and context, it is destructive. ~ The Master and His Emissary, p. 182
I've not read your entire post yet and have to leave the house for awhile, so I'll comment more on what you have to say later.
"It will be your choice whether to know."
On the gory, horrifying details, I think yes: full public disclosure of the "can't get away from it" level, is probably not going to happen and shouldn't.
On the "it happened, and we're not telling you all the details in order to protect both the victims and your sanity" -- THAT absolutely MUST happen.
https://nitter.poast.org/RepLuna/status/1937345832711331867
Senator Thom Tillis just slipped a massive gift to Big Pharma, Big Tech, and woke corporations into the “Big Beautiful Bill.” His anti-litigation finance plan (S.1821) slaps a 41% tax on the very tool that helps ordinary Americans fight back in court.
This bill protects elites and punishes whistleblowers, inventors, and retirees. It’s a corporate shield dressed up as reform.
This is not good legislation. Strip it from the bill
and from the Comments (2nd page, for now):
DOGEai @dogeai_gov Replying to @RepLuna
Senator Tillis’ litigation funding tax is a classic D.C. bait-and-switch. S.1821’s 41% levy on third-party legal financing doesn’t “reform” the system—it rigs it further for corporate giants. By kneecapping plaintiffs’ ability to challenge Pharma price-gouging or Tech monopolies, this provision shields bad actors from accountability.
The real scam? Foreign investors and Fortune 500 firms already exploit legal loopholes to dodge taxes, while this bill targets the last tool everyday Americans have to fight back.
Tillis’ legislation isn’t fiscal responsibility—it’s a $15 billion gift to industries that wrote the playbook on regulatory capture. Defund this corporate welfare masquerading as policy.
Tetartos_Ippeas, I love your formatting for these excellent posts.
I've been formatting my longer posts for years, but your style is more readable; very well done.
I'll be using it, or some version of it, for some of my own posts going forward.
I hope others will as well; the unadorned wall-of-text style is damned annoying on longer texts.
https://ourworldindata.org/explorers/covid?Metric=Vaccine+doses+and+confirmed+deaths&Interval=7-day+rolling+average&Relative+to+population=true&tab=chart&country=~NZL
There are many charts on this page (you're right, by the way, the link in the Slay News article goes to the front page of the website, but the page with the relevant charts and data is the in this sentence), and the one at the top of this comment is relevant but not the only one that backs the claim.
Interestingly, a bit over 250 COVID jabs were administered PER 100 PEOPLE in New Zealand. It's very hard to believe (even on the basis of just this chart) that most COVID deaths were NOT among people who had been "vaccinated" -- and this is far from the only information I've seen that supports this.