Using the entire comment limit, let us take a look at the history of two sitting presidents who were actually assassinated, and what they had to say before the act:
Looking at Abraham Lincoln:
Concerning an interview in the White House during August 1861, Roman Catholic priest Charles Chiniquy published the President’s words in his own autobiography, "Fifty Years In The Church of Rome":
I feel more and more every day, [stated the President] that it is not
against the Americans of the South, alone, I am fighting. It is more against
the Pope of Rome, his Jesuits and their slaves. Very few Southern leaders are
not under the influence of the Jesuits, through their wives, family relations,
and their friends...
Neither Jeff Davis not any one of the Confederacy would have dared to attack
the North had they not relied on the promises of the Jesuits that, under the
mask of democracy, the money and the aims of the Roman Catholics, even the arms of France, were at their disposal if they would attack us. I pity the priests,
the bishops, and monks of Rome in the United States when the people realize
that they are in great part responsible for the tears and the blood shed in
this war. I conceal what I know, for if the people knew the whole truth, this
war would turn into a religious war, and at once, take a tenfold more savage
and bloody character...
On the morning of Monday the 17th, three days after the April 14th assassination of Lincoln, Rev. Conwell hurried to St. Paul and reported to the newspaper that in St. Joseph he had been informed of President Lincoln’s assassination three hours before the event took place. The paper published his report:
We have now before us, wrote Commissioner Harris, positive evidence that
these Jesuit Fathers, priests of Rome, engaged in preparing young men for the
priesthood away out in the village of St. Joseph, in far off Minnesota, were in
correspondence with their brethren in Washington City, and had been informed
that the plan to assassinate the President had been matured, the agents for its
accomplishment had been found, the time for its execution had been set, and so sure were they of its accomplishment, that they could announce it as already
done, three or four hours before it had been consummated. The anticipation of
its accomplishment so elated them that they could not refrain from passing it
around... as a piece of glorious news.
Very interesting how people in the comments are asking for a douay rheims writing, especially when considering that the same writers were from the same Jesuit/Roman Catholic/Masonic group as told by Lincoln.
Thirty years after the assassination, a member of the Hunter Commission,
Brigadier General Thomas M. Harris, published a small book revealing that
Lincoln’s assassination had actually been a Jesuit murder plot to extirpate a
Protestant ruler. Harris stated:
It is fact well established that the headquarters of the conspiracy was the
house of a Roman Catholic family, of which Mrs. Mary E. Surratt was the head;
and that all of its inmates, including a number of boarders, were devoted
members of the Roman Catholic Church. This house was the meeting place, the council chamber, of Booth and his co-conspirators, including Mrs. Mary E.
Surratt, and her son, John H. Surratt, who, next to Booth, were the most active
members of the conspiracy....
Hard evidence of that conversion was found on the assassin’s corpse: “On
examination of Booth’s person after his death, it was found that he was wearing
a Catholic medal under his vest, and over his heart.
Let us continue with JFK's Address to the Houston Ministers Conference, 12 September 1960:
I believe in an America where the separation of church and state is
absolute--where no Catholic prelate would tell the President (should he be
Catholic) how to act, and no Protestant minister would tell his parishioners for
whom to vote--where no church or church school is granted any public funds or
political preference--and where no man is denied public office merely because
his religion differs from the President who might appoint him or the people who
might elect him.
I believe in an America that is officially neither Catholic, Protestant nor
Jewish--where no public official either requests or accepts instructions on
public policy from the Pope, the National Council of Churches or any other
ecclesiastical source--where no religious body seeks to impose its will
directly or indirectly upon the general populace or the public acts of its
officials--and where religious liberty is so indivisible that an act against
one church is treated as an act against all.
Before continuing, let us know that the Jesuit, in their own words, swear on oath to put on any hat, to take on any role assigned to them, in the pursuit of the efforts of the roman catholic church. None of this are our own words, nor our own statements, but pieces of history shared throughout time for all to make their own decisions. This piece of the Jesuit oath, and the complete Jesuit oath, would be shared by former priests such as Alberto Rivera:
You have been taught to insidiously plant the seeds of jealousy and hatred between communities, provinces and states that were at peace, and incite them to deeds of blood, involving them in war with each other, and to create revolutions and civil wars in countries that were independent and prosperous, cultivating the arts and sciences and enjoying the blessings of peace. To take sides with the combatants and to act secretly in concert with your brother Jesuit, who may be engaged on the other side, but openly opposed to that with which you might be connected; only that the Church might be the gainer in the end, in the conditions fixed in the treaties for peace and that the end justifies the means.
The Catholic, or the Jew, or the Quaker, or the Unitarian, or the Baptist, that JFK speaks in the full speech, may very well be just another Jesuit, or the like, in disguise. It is one thing to speak of something, another thing to understand of something, and a completely different thing to act accordingly to both the speaking and understanding. Let us see the conclusion to the speech of JFK here:
That is the kind of America in which I believe. And it represents the kind of
Presidency in which I believe--a great office that must neither be humbled by
making it the instrument of any one religious group nor tarnished by
arbitrarily withholding its occupancy from the members of any one religious
group. I believe in a President whose religious views are his own private
affair, neither imposed by him upon the nation or imposed by the nation upon
him as a condition to holding that office.
Before the assassination of JFK, he too conveyed similar feelings as Abraham
Lincoln, but unlike Lincoln, JFK spoke publicly. In no unclear terms did president JFK call for the separation of church and state, for america to stay away from the hand of rome, and in no unclear terms did the secret military of roman catholicism respond. This is history, spoken in their own words.
Speaking of the KJV of the Bible, let us read what is actually said:
Thou sawest till that a stone was cut out without hands, which smote the image upon his feet that were of iron and clay, and brake them to pieces.
(Daniel 2:34)
And in the days of these kings shall the God of heaven set up a kingdom, which shall never be destroyed: and the kingdom shall not be left to other people, but it shall break in pieces and consume all these kingdoms, and it shall stand for ever.
(Daniel 2:44)
There will be no human intervention in the setting up of a kingdom on earth. Any type of theory of dominionism, of dispensationalism, of futurism, of preterism, of amillenianism, are not in harmony with the Bible. The Kingdom is set up without human hands, and all glory belongs to Christ Jesus.
But woe unto you, scribes and Pharisees, hypocrites! for ye shut up the kingdom of heaven against men: for ye neither go in yourselves, neither suffer ye them that are entering to go in.
(Matthew 23:13)
Forcing the unity of church and state, attempting to dictate conscious, trying to set up a kingdom made with mans hands, is hiding the truth from men, is forcing a choice on men, is "shutting up the Kingdom of heaven against men".
Jesus answered, My kingdom is not of this world: if my kingdom were of this world, then would my servants fight, that I should not be delivered to the Jews: but now is my kingdom not from hence.
Pilate therefore said unto him, Art thou a king then? Jesus answered, Thou sayest that I am a king. To this end was I born, and for this cause came I into the world, that I should bear witness unto the truth. Every one that is of the truth heareth my voice.
(John 18:36-37)
Then said they unto him, What shall we do, that we might work the works of God?
Jesus answered and said unto them, This is the work of God, that ye believe on
him whom he hath sent.
Thus saith the Lord, Let not the wise man glory in his wisdom, neither let the
mighty man glory in his might, let not the rich man glory in his riches:
But let him that glorieth glory in this, that he understandeth and knoweth me,
that I am the Lord which exercise lovingkindness, judgment, and righteousness,
in the earth: for in these things I delight, saith the Lord.
(John 6:28-29, Jeremiah 9:23-24)
A proper knowledge and understanding of the Bible is paramount, for:
My people are destroyed for lack of knowledge: because thou hast rejected
knowledge, I will also reject thee, that thou shalt be no priest to me: seeing
thou hast forgotten the law of thy God, I will also forget thy children.
Think not that I am come to destroy the law, or the prophets: I am not come to
destroy, but to fulfil.
For verily I say unto you, Till heaven and earth pass, one jot or one tittle
shall in no wise pass from the law, till all be fulfilled.
(Hosea 4:6, Matthew 5:17-18)
Take note of the Ten Commandments, first written in the Old Testament then established in the New Testament, and compare this to what is introduced to the world:
And God spake all these words, saying,
I am the Lord thy God, which have brought thee out of the land of Egypt, out of the house of bondage.
Thou shalt have no other gods before me.
Thou shalt not make unto thee any graven image, or any likeness of any thing that is in heaven above, or that is in the earth beneath, or that is in the water under the earth.
Thou shalt not bow down thyself to them, nor serve them: for I the Lord thy God am a jealous God, visiting the iniquity of the fathers upon the children unto the third and fourth generation of them that hate me;
And shewing mercy unto thousands of them that love me, and keep my commandments.
Thou shalt not take the name of the Lord thy God in vain; for the Lord will not hold him guiltless that taketh his name in vain.
Remember the sabbath day, to keep it holy.
Six days shalt thou labour, and do all thy work:
But the seventh day is the sabbath of the Lord thy God: in it thou shalt not do any work, thou, nor thy son, nor thy daughter, thy manservant, nor thy maidservant, nor thy cattle, nor thy stranger that is within thy gates:
For in six days the Lord made heaven and earth, the sea, and all that in them is, and rested the seventh day: wherefore the Lord blessed the sabbath day, and hallowed it.
Honour thy father and thy mother: that thy days may be long upon the land which the Lord thy God giveth thee.
Thou shalt not kill.
Thou shalt not commit adultery.
Thou shalt not steal.
Thou shalt not bear false witness against thy neighbour.
Thou shalt not covet thy neighbour's house, thou shalt not covet thy neighbour's wife, nor his manservant, nor his maidservant, nor his ox, nor his ass, nor any thing that is thy neighbour's.
(Exodus 20:1-17)
Here is the patience of the saints: here are they that keep the commandments
of God, and the faith of Jesus.
(Revelation 14:12)
Using the entire comment limit, let us take a look at the history of two sitting presidents who were actually assassinated, and what they had to say before the act:
Looking at Abraham Lincoln:
Concerning an interview in the White House during August 1861, Roman Catholic priest Charles Chiniquy published the President’s words in his own autobiography, "Fifty Years In The Church of Rome":
On the morning of Monday the 17th, three days after the April 14th assassination of Lincoln, Rev. Conwell hurried to St. Paul and reported to the newspaper that in St. Joseph he had been informed of President Lincoln’s assassination three hours before the event took place. The paper published his report:
Very interesting how people in the comments are asking for a douay rheims writing, especially when considering that the same writers were from the same Jesuit/Roman Catholic/Masonic group as told by Lincoln.
Thirty years after the assassination, a member of the Hunter Commission, Brigadier General Thomas M. Harris, published a small book revealing that Lincoln’s assassination had actually been a Jesuit murder plot to extirpate a Protestant ruler. Harris stated:
Let us continue with JFK's Address to the Houston Ministers Conference, 12 September 1960:
Before continuing, let us know that the Jesuit, in their own words, swear on oath to put on any hat, to take on any role assigned to them, in the pursuit of the efforts of the roman catholic church. None of this are our own words, nor our own statements, but pieces of history shared throughout time for all to make their own decisions. This piece of the Jesuit oath, and the complete Jesuit oath, would be shared by former priests such as Alberto Rivera:
The Catholic, or the Jew, or the Quaker, or the Unitarian, or the Baptist, that JFK speaks in the full speech, may very well be just another Jesuit, or the like, in disguise. It is one thing to speak of something, another thing to understand of something, and a completely different thing to act accordingly to both the speaking and understanding. Let us see the conclusion to the speech of JFK here:
Before the assassination of JFK, he too conveyed similar feelings as Abraham Lincoln, but unlike Lincoln, JFK spoke publicly. In no unclear terms did president JFK call for the separation of church and state, for america to stay away from the hand of rome, and in no unclear terms did the secret military of roman catholicism respond. This is history, spoken in their own words.
Speaking of the KJV of the Bible, let us read what is actually said:
There will be no human intervention in the setting up of a kingdom on earth. Any type of theory of dominionism, of dispensationalism, of futurism, of preterism, of amillenianism, are not in harmony with the Bible. The Kingdom is set up without human hands, and all glory belongs to Christ Jesus.
Forcing the unity of church and state, attempting to dictate conscious, trying to set up a kingdom made with mans hands, is hiding the truth from men, is forcing a choice on men, is "shutting up the Kingdom of heaven against men".
A proper knowledge and understanding of the Bible is paramount, for:
Take note of the Ten Commandments, first written in the Old Testament then established in the New Testament, and compare this to what is introduced to the world: