While GAW is high as a kite over Gaetz's nomination, there is a consideration we need to think about:

While Gaetz is Trump's first pick, he's NOT Trump's final, or real, AG pick.

Gaetz's Trump's first low-ball offer to the seller when negotiating deals, something Trump has plenty of experience with. When making deals, you first throw out an extreme number that is the absolute minimum or maximum end that you are willing to go with, and the opposite side will do the same to you.

Then, the you and the opposite side will negotiate down to a medium that hopefully satisfies you and your main objectives.

Gaetz, while our ideal man for the job, might be considered to be too extreme to do the job effectively (and I don't think GAW nor Truth Social had him in the list of seriously-discussed AG candidates, so it clues us in the fact that his nomination is a complete surprise, and potentially not that serious.) I bet that Gaetz is there to make the final AG choice Trump has seem more tame in comparison.

Of course, Gaetz could be sworn in normally, which is still good for us..

And with regards to the talk about Article II Section 3, my problem with that possibility is that I don't think that route has been tested and proven to actually work without significant and real damage backlash that WILL harm the MAGA movement. Plus, it might give the enemy the green-light to use this tool against us if they succeeded in seizing power from us again. Also, the only source of this notion is "though a writer", which holds as much water as "anonymous sources" or "sources close to the Trump Administration", which is absolutely no water.

Sounds like a rumor to smear Trump again.