I saw mounds of evidence. Seen soo many irregularities. 2000 Mules etc...I usually have an answer for most topics, but is stumped on this one. Can any of you patriots answer this question?...Why didn't the courts take on the lawsuits if there is was soo much evidence?...There were quite a bit of Trump appointed judges that rejected the lawsuits...WHY!???
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (34)
sorted by:
You saw the evidence. They did not let the evidence any where near a court room. Media can say it was presented to the courts and they found no evidence of voter fraud. It is a built in lie that is true.
"We believe we have no standing" is the court lie. Which is why there is a lawsuit to say ask; "shouldn't one or all of these courts up hold their constitution duties?"