Of course. I was addressing linguistic syntax, not law.
The children did NOT report that they were allegedly abused as you stated. They reported that they were abused.
When someone reports a crime, they don't say it allegedly happened. No one walks into a police station after a mugging and announces "A man just allegedly robbed me!"
Thank you and you have a good day also. I just still have the Sheriffs Dept mindset. So it still works on the presumption of innocent until convicted. We would not bring them to trial if we thought it was alleged. We bring the evidence. Despite this it is the jury who decides. Despite there being allegations this person should have been removed with paid leave. You run the risk of even more victims if it pans out.
OK but the children didn't report that they were allegedly abused.
They reported—that is, they alleged—that they were factually abused.
Everything is alleged until they are convicted by the jury.
Of course. I was addressing linguistic syntax, not law.
The children did NOT report that they were allegedly abused as you stated. They reported that they were abused.
When someone reports a crime, they don't say it allegedly happened. No one walks into a police station after a mugging and announces "A man just allegedly robbed me!"
Anywho, have a good one anon
Thank you and you have a good day also. I just still have the Sheriffs Dept mindset. So it still works on the presumption of innocent until convicted. We would not bring them to trial if we thought it was alleged. We bring the evidence. Despite this it is the jury who decides. Despite there being allegations this person should have been removed with paid leave. You run the risk of even more victims if it pans out.