We'll agree to disagree on your finding that following the law in general is equivalent to taking an illegally mandated experimental poison since both actions involve obeying a directive of some sort.
Anywho, which one of these is you? https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UAulwY5ePWc
NYT reporters slapped with emergency subpoenas — their pre-written obits and “air disaster” stories already queued up.
What. The actual. Fuck.
It's spelled right; capitol refers to a building
No takeover of any government by islamics, however slowly accomplished, ever ends well for the people.
NYT reporters slapped with emergency subpoenas — their pre-written obits and “air disaster” stories already queued up.
WTAF. This says the NYTimes was informed of a plot to kill Trump and didn't warn him.
In unrelated news, Abraham Lincoln SHUT DOWN over 300 newspapers.
Ain't that a glitch
Yup.
All part of Clown World.
We live in a timeline where men are women, deadly poison is forced on billions of humans as a mandated vaccine, former presidents and their wives run human trafficking syndicates, a foreign muslim socialist runs NYC, federal judges outrank the president, and an avowed communist can express alarm at members of his party going socialist,...
...and nobody but us ever questions any of it.
Who's the guy talking besides some anonymous guy
I'm pretty sure I don't understand how a nation can wage full scale war with no army, navy, air force, ballistic missile capability, arms manufacturing, etc.
Something is not right
So what's your solution? Crush AI development?
Not happening. The Chinese would rule the world in no time.
So it might be costing some jobs RIGHT NOW but could very easily end up creating tons of jobs in the near future
Any law repugnant to the Constitution is null and void.
I knew if I waited long enough, you could come up with something sensible we can agree on. We live in a nation of laws, not mandates. Well done anon
You sound vaxed
Lame. Did you actually just equate cooperating with police and following the law...with obediently taking an experimental poison mandated as part of a govt depopulation program? smh
We're done here
Thanks anon
How telling....
...that the mere idea of making America great is identified solely with conservatives, libertarians, republicans, the patriotic right...the good people. The ones who respect America, the Constitution, and laws derived from it.
No democrat worth his saltpeter would ever want to view America as great or ever proudly fly her flag. WE OWN the America-loving space outright.
WE ARE America.
Feels good man
She wanted a haircut through her dishrag (because that smelly thing ain't coming off in public)... at a men's barber shop?
I don't get it
Anyone inside or outside of government who thinks Donald Trump is going to just let any more elections get stolen on his watch is profoundly retarded.
He would declare a national emergency and martial law, or cancel the election altogether, before he would ever let that happen. As long as we get out the vote there's nothing to worry about.
LOL You don't understand what the system DOESN'T fear: sovereign non-citizens pretending the court has no jurisdiction so the law doesn't apply to them, or that masses of Americans will ever buy into the ideology and overthrow the system of laws and statutes.
You also don't understand that complying with laws and enforcement officers doesn't involve fear; it involves a moral compass, logic and common sense. Obeying the law comes naturally to most of us.
90 miles is too close to Florida not to be US territory and a glittering vacation destination instead of a threatening socialist hellhole
WTF I love China now
Qeq
But...how many can there be? Who knew China would let you ever build a mosque in the first place?
Your religion is a religion only until the other religions recognize it as not a religion but a dangerous cult and a mental illness featuring delusions of holiness and obsession with world domination via mass slaughter of all the other religions.
The little conical hat is killing me
If airlines start agreeing to not seat someone next to a woman based on his religion, then they will be forced to not seat me next to a homosexual based on mine.
What was the list of banks supposed to mean
Yeah, there's no way an esteemed publication like the New York Times would ever do something like that. What was I thinking.