I was just watching a video wherein a affluent liberal dad was asking AITAH for cutting off college tuition and room and board for his two sons because they voted for Trump.

Naturally, every liberal responded he had "done the right thing" and was a "great dad" for "teaching his kids a valuable lesson".

If this is true (let's assume for a moment that it is) -- I am curious about the following issue:

When a woman divorces a wealthy man she receives alimony because she has "grown accustomed to a lifestyle". (Let's not get sidetracked into a discussion about whether or not alimony is justified, okay?)

I am curious then -- as to whether these two sons (who have grown accustomed to a lifestyle of having their tuition and room and board paid by dad) would have cause to bring legal action because they have been cut off of funding due to their choice to vote for Trump.

How different is it really? Both cases involve being cut off from funding due to an inability to "get along".

Just throwing it out there in case this idea spreads. Many young people voted for Trump.