It sounds to me like a place where a lot of ex parte information can be passed around, and agreements can be reached apart from any oversight. Has John Roberts assured the Trump hating judges that when Trump's appeals reach the SC, he will block them? That seems to be what he indicated with his defense of Boasberg.
We have to wait for the third act. Last weekish, a script writer posted (or was quoted) as saying that this is unfolding like your typical 3 act movie. And we ARE told we are watching a move. So ACT1: Trump does a thing. ACT 2: Judges counter. ACT 3: Trump comes in and smashes them for a win. Meanwhile, the corrupt judges are red-flagging themselves. It seems that when they red-flag themselves, then things start appearing in the news exposing their corruption. Like Boasburg and his daughter.
The true dichotomy is NOT good and evil. It is life and death. The law is good, but it cannot give life. In Genesis 2:9, good and evil are joined on the same tree-the tree of the knowledge of good and evil, which is the tree of death.
The problem, unaddressed by the Kalergi plan, is the matter of organ/ bone marrow transplants. It's very difficult to find a match in mixed races: https://www.sbs.com.au/news/article/why-mixed-race-minorities-struggle-to-find-life-saving-transplant-matches/l2axfktow
Judge Boasberg said Trump’s invocation of the Alien Enemies Act to deport criminal aliens is “incredibly troublesome and problematic” and threatened the Trump Admin with consequences if they violate his order in the future.
Notice, he didn't say it was illegal, or unconstitutional, or that Trump didn't have the authority to invoke the Alien Enemies Act. It's just that Boasberg found it "troublesome and problemation." I'm sure it is, for HIM! Then without addressing Trump's authority over a lawful action, he just reiterated his threat. Welp, if Trump is acting under the AEA, he is not violating Boasberg's orders. His orders are moot.