Pam Bondi no friend to 2A
(bearingarms.com)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (31)
sorted by:
Not only has Trump identified the traitors in Congress with his nominations, he has shined a light on the shills of this board.
You appear to be calling me a shill. Why? I think this deserves highlighting
Right.
It’s a moot point. She doesn’t make laws. She isn’t against the 2nd amendment. You may disagree with her on a law that is related to the 2nd amendment but she in now way wants to repeal the 2nd amendment.
I agree with you on these points and disagree with Bondi. I wouldn’t vote for her as a lawmaker. She is what Trump needs at the moment and I am not wanting to throw the baby out with the bathwater.
And I don’t believe most of these posts attacking her are genuine.
Mostly I agree with what you said- not everyone is perfect. However, this deserves to be noted.
And I understand that. Some of these appointments are going to work out and some not. It is just the volume of negative posts, by “Trump supporters”, on his nominations that get on my head. It seems like some sort of brigading by the bad guys. I just snapped on you.
Making valid points is not shilling. She may not make laws but she has great influence in the Making of laws. Settling for crumbs always bite you in the behind in the long run.
You need to list alternatives that have a chance at getting confirmed.
I think she is far from crumbs. More like highly desirable for this job with a couple of flaws.
I am more concerned that she could be a plant that could turn on Trump once she is in control. Not any of the nitpicky things she will have no power over whatsoever.
I do agree that discussing her issues is fair game. Again it is the volume and tone of the attacks that wear me out. They do protest too much, and I am just as sensitive of shills infiltrateing this forum as swamp creatures infiltrating Trump’s inner circle.
She's crumbs compared to Sydney Powell to name one. I am sure there are others. Someone posting a conflict in a thoughtful, serious manner based on evidence is a thinking person not a shill. Shills don't last long here. Shills name call when you disagree with them. We are into TRUTH FIRST. That's what lead American Excellence.
I do like Sydney. And agree with everything you say.