How Pam Bondi Can Atone for the Framing of George Zimmerman
(spectator.org)
Comments (17)
sorted by:
High profile case -- race baiters calling for blood ==> prosecutor going for blood to advance career.
Seems like careerism to me. More than her ideology. But shame on her for caving to the headlines, right?
Is that what she did (rightly or wrongly) Or did she passionately believe she was doing the right thing as a state prosecutor? The only person who knew what was in her heart is her.
The facts of the case are MORE important than her feelings about it.
At the time there seemed to be some railroading going on. Just saying.
Understood. I’m just saying strong opinions are fine but they do not constitute legal fact in this situation.
I like Bondi for AG. That being said, I don't trust anyone that is a LAWYER! I have never met one that didn't think they knew it all and would sell their own Savior for 30 pieces of silver. Jus sayin!
In law, a frame-up (frameup) or setup is the act of falsely implicating (framing) someone in a crime by providing fabricated evidence or testimony.
What evidence or testimony in this case Did she fabricate. If she did, how come she was not disbarred?
Knowing it was a case of self-defense, she appointed a corrupt special prosecutor and arranged for two biased, corrupt judges — one was so obvious he was disqualified -- who did their best to convict Zimmerman. She enabled the race hustlers that destroyed George Zimmerman’s life and plunged America into a racial morass from which it has not yet recovered. At the time, she basked in that destructive glory
https://www.americanthinker.com/blog/2024/11/what_you_don_t_know_and_need_to_know_about_pam_bondi.html
I’ve read this and other articles about this prosecution. Feelings and hunches are great but, but if any of these significant accusations were true and provable, she would have been disbarred, not nominated as the future AG.
Cmon man, you know it doesnt always work this way....not saying it doesnt or does apply to Pam
"but if any of these significant accusations were true and provable, she would have been disbarred, not nominated as the future AG."
Thats logic similar to "IF Trump wasnt guilty he wouldnt be charged."
Wow wow ,, no kidding , you’re correct, it doesn’t work that way . Seriously .. when they do wrong they are disbarred or arrested ? Someone hasn’t been watching our Justice system the past 30 years or forever , but especially the last 4 ! I’m not thrilled about Pam but my opinion is just that !
Now you’re going Joe Biden on me? C’mon man back at ya, lol
Well if you gonna use Biden like arguements.......
You said C’mon Man first.😜
Yes read it a while back.. Sundance clearly does not like her, I get it. Still begs the question of how is she still a lawyer and will become the next US AG?