.....
A leading demographer has warned that the white British population may become a minority by the middle of the century if current trends continue as Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer declared this week that the “open borders experiment” was a failure imposed on the country by “design”.
In an apparent confirmation of what many derided as a “conspiracy theory”, the notion of a “Great Replacement” agenda, Prime Minister Starmer said that previous Tory governments “deliberately” decided to liberalise immigration following Brexit to “turn Britain into a one-nation experiment in open borders.”
“This happened by design, not accident. Policies were reformed… Global Britain – remember that slogan… That is what they meant. A policy with no support… Well that’s unforgivable,” he said.
While the prime minister was correct in noting that the so-called Conservative governments of Boris Johnson and Rishi Sunak allowed in unprecedented levels of immigration following Brexit — by refusing to put an annual cap on immigration resulting in nearly one million migrants arriving last year, alone — the open borders agenda imposed on the country pre-dates Tory rule.
Indeed, prior to the Labour government of former PM Tony Blair, the UK had net migration in the tens of thousands, however, under Blair this began to soar into the hundreds of thousands per year. In 2009, former Blair advisor Andrew Neather claimed that this was a deliberate policy to transform Britain into a multicultural society and to “rub the right’s nose in diversity.”
The mass migration policies of both Labour and Conservative governments have had a radical impact on the demographic make up of the UK, with the 2021 census finding that less than three quarters (74.4 per cent) of the population identify as a member of indigenous ethnic groups of the British Isles (English, Welsh, Scottish, Northern Irish, or British). This is compared to 80 per cent in 2011 and 87.5 per cent in 2001.
Associate research fellow at Birkbeck, University of London and a senior member at St Antony’s College, Oxford, Dr Paul Morland warned this week that if the political class fails to reverse course, the native white British population could become a minority in their own country by 2050.
Dr Morland, who has been described as the UK’s leading demographer, said that since the Blair administration, the UK has seen “more immigration than we had in the whole period from the Norman Conquest to the Second World War.”
He said that if the government continues on the same course, people in the country 30 years ago were overwhelmingly the descendants of people here a thousand years ago, that’s not going to be the case in the middle of the century.” However, Dr Morland argued that “nothing is predetermined”, pointing to the example of former British colony Singapore, which strictly controls immigration.
“It’s a choice, what do we as a country want and does that manage to get expressed and implemented by our politicians. It seems quite clear to me that those two are not the same, the country wants one thing and the politicians are not prepared to follow,” he said.
Noting the “related” issue of declining birth rates, the top demographer said that cutting immigration must be accompanied with pro-natalist policies to encourage the native population have more children to mitigate the financial impacts of a declining population. Morland has previously pointed to policies implemented by the populist-conservative government of Viktor Orbán in Hungary, such as tax and other incentives for mothers, as a potential framework.
While Prime Minister Starmer committed this week to increasing economic opportunities for young people and reforming the immigration system, his government has refused to commit to an annual cap on immigration, which critics have argued is necessary to stem the massive influx of foreigners into the country.
Commentators on social media asserted that Starmer’s comments were an implicit admission of the much-derided “Great Replacement Theory”. Although often portrayed as a “racist” conspiracy theory, the concept, developed by French Renaud Camus, argues that the real aim of mass migration policies are motivated by economics, with leaders seeing their populations as little more than interchangeable cogs who can be changed out with little consequence to bolster GDP.
Speaking to Breitbart News in 2018, Camus said that globalist forces, such as those involved with the Davos-based World Economic Forum, support “the change of people and civilisation for the sake of the industry of man, the economic system which produces the Undifferentiated Human Matter, the human Nutella, spreadable at will.”
.....
.....
IMHO this is only surface related to race and used to obscure the real objective. This is a CULTURAL genocide attempt. On a global level. A actual “melting” pot designed to merge all cultures into one with only the state as the authority of acceptable traditions and ideas. Skin tone is a red herring that they are using to prevent people from fighting for culture. It just so happens that the culture with the most fight and biggest threat to totalitarianism is the west and thus light skinned. If the culture they wanted to destroy was dark skinned this would be happening to Africa. Actually it did but in a smaller scale. Ignore history at your own risk. The Elites were slave masters and they learned from that. Before you can own a people you must erase their cultural identity. Rome were discovered this power and this fact has not changed. There was a documentary I saw as a child that discussed Anglo history and at the end the host said something very profound.” The biggest obstacle to globalization is the Anglo Saxon culture and that must be dealt with first there to be a true global state” this was before they knew to hid such open intentions. Anglo Saxon culture is the worst blend for easily ruled people. It emphasizes enough self autonomy that it demands any authority be loose enough to allow men to self rule for the most part BUT it also retains enough social ties within the family and greater community to allow for assembly in defense and in times of need. The warrior cultures that blended had both protective and self sustaining identity in balance to make it a culture that is almost impossible to impose rule on with out their consent. When we let them frame the discussion and turn it into a race discussion we are loosing the thread. The fact is England ground zero to erase those pesky rebellious mutts who keep insisting that man is subservient to no other man without respect of free will. Thus the big waves of immigrants. If this was racial it would be more effective to trickle in and hide the negative individuals that give connotations which repel the dominant culture. This would facilitate more interbreeding. Instead they are pushing cultural clashes on purpose in hopes of being able to step into the chaos and impose order. A race war is a great way to wipe out all the fighters. When that happens it won’t matter the skin color any vestiges of all cultures especially those that will fight for their identity