Not sure what you're getting at fren. My link goes to the post from Kash that we're discussing...
Currently @X is the official company account where they announce features, issues, policy, etc.
The history of the @X account is a bit amusing though.
According to information available on X, Gene X Hwang did not accept financial compensation because he was not offered any. However, he was given the new handle @x12345678998765, and he was offered X merchandise and a visit to X's headquarters. It's not explicitly stated if he accepted these offers, but posts on X indicate that he had previously turned down private offers for the account which were much more than what he was given by X.
So the @X has to do with an official account? I’ve never seen that before and was sincerely trying to learn about it - and, yes, verify that the account was genuine. My own attempts at researching it online were unsuccessful. (I did try.) I find myself overly suspicious these days. But I research everything - apply the Acts 17:11 concept across the board.
Thank you for taking the time to explain it to me. I truly appreciate it.
I cannot find this post on @Kash_Patel on X.
But if I put in Hello@X, it comes up saying @ Kash_Patel with completely different posts. Is Hello@X a fake?
https://x.com/Kash_Patel/status/1863285220532695481
Your link goes to the Hello@X @Kash_Patel, not the plain @Kash_Patel.
You can see Hello@X just below @Kash_Patel - you can see it on this post’s screenshot.
While both accounts have some posts in common, this particular post does not appear on the @Kash_Patel that does not have Hello@X.
Here is the link to the profile page - there is no link to the profile for the Hello@X one
https://x.com/Kash_Patel
The link leads directly to the real, verified @kash_patel saying “Hello @X”
What are you on about with trying to treat “hello@x” as the account name?
Not sure what you're getting at fren. My link goes to the post from Kash that we're discussing...
Currently @X is the official company account where they announce features, issues, policy, etc.
The history of the @X account is a bit amusing though.
So the @X has to do with an official account? I’ve never seen that before and was sincerely trying to learn about it - and, yes, verify that the account was genuine. My own attempts at researching it online were unsuccessful. (I did try.) I find myself overly suspicious these days. But I research everything - apply the Acts 17:11 concept across the board. Thank you for taking the time to explain it to me. I truly appreciate it.
And BTW, in my research, I did find this:
https://x.com/BrouwerClaire/status/1863293320836829336