Bye Bye Mitt the Rino dirt bag
(twitter.com)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (45)
sorted by:
Honestly, it just seems like you're being contentious for the sake of brewing conflict. I don't know what your history with the church is, but I can tell that you don't have a properly informed understanding of the doctrine of the church itself, and I don't believe that you're interested in learning it either, just that at best, you have a flawed understanding of church doctrine, and at worst, you want to take what is taught, and twist it into some false narrative.
If the "Mormon Jesus" - and what a laughable distinction that is - is as the LDS church describes, then what, exactly, is the contention? What, there going to be a "Protestant Jesus" or a "Catholic Jesus" or a "Baptist Jesus" waiting in the wings? No. Jesus Christ is Jesus Christ. If there is no Jesus Christ, and no God as Christianity believes - and make no mistake, the LDS church is a subsect of Christianity, whether you wish to believe it or not - then, okay, we were wrong. But if there is, and Christ will come as the LDS believe, then does that automatically mean that there will be a "Mormon Global Order"? No, it doesn't, and that's an incredibly flawed and misstated take. Basically, all this boils down to is "Is the LDS understanding correct, or is it not?"
At the end of the day, it's a set of religious beliefs to base one's moral code on. If it's true, then it will play out, and if it's not, then nothing will happen. It is literally that binary. In the mean time, the teachings are there to inform church goers what ideals to strive toward, as is the case with literally every other religion and structured belief system. You make it sound like LDS Missionaries are going out and demanding that they "baptize in the name of Mormon", just for the sake of sewing confusion and contention. Rather, they are following their beliefs, and speaking to anyone who is willing to listen. Who are you to have a problem with that, with people making their own choices?
Moreover, why are you demonizing an entire group of people like that? To go back to the root of this, Romney is not a paragon of "Mormons", he's a corrupted politician whose adherence to the faith is extreme doubt. If you want to shit on him, go right ahead - you'll find many LDS members in agreement. But to shit on the entire religion, and by extension, everyone who follows it, as well? That's quite a bit more extreme.