As an American, I decided to determine my own fitness for a role in RFK Jr.’s cabinet of horrors. It was a disquieting experience. The first 17 (17!) questions in the test are all pattern recognition, where you’re asked to slot a geometrical graphic into a row of three without breaking order. After that, you’re ushered to some good old-fashioned word association, and asked to determine, through multiple choice, the closest definitional relative of a particular article of speech. (Like, say, matching “envy” up with “jealousy.”)
I haven't found any way to verify this. It'd make sense that this is perhaps being done internally for the transition team or in preparation for taking over HHS.
It makes sense that you'd want to create neutral screening methods that examine a person's aptitude to identify signals and perform logical analysis, rather than measuring ones ability to become accredited and submit to authority.
I haven't found any way to verify this. It'd make sense that this is perhaps being done internally for the transition team or in preparation for taking over HHS.
It makes sense that you'd want to create neutral screening methods that examine a person's aptitude to identify signals and perform logical analysis, rather than measuring ones ability to become accredited and submit to authority.
https://iasassessment.com/session/register/gen112413181mvst?_cio_id=f6c60614fd1fbeef24