No, I don't want her there either. And I think she can be blocked because she's not constitutionally legal to be President (or VP either, for that matter).
I'm not a Constitutional scholar, but it is just WRONG that anything he "decides" to do should stand. Surely there should be some remedy for his ludicrous actions. Could the Supreme Court intervene?
Yeah but they have to remove him from office on the basis he cant do the job. Someones got to come forward and do that.
That would have to be the Vice President by law.
Am I the only one who doesn’t want the drunken Indian whore be down in, even for a day?
No, I don't want her there either. And I think she can be blocked because she's not constitutionally legal to be President (or VP either, for that matter).
I'm not a Constitutional scholar, but it is just WRONG that anything he "decides" to do should stand. Surely there should be some remedy for his ludicrous actions. Could the Supreme Court intervene?