Devil's Advocate here, while I share the concern he has, he is extrapolating a bit here. from the bit of context of the paper he gives, it sounds like this is more of an inhalable vaccination administered nasally rather than some sort of vaccine bomb dropped on a city.
There's no doubt in my mind that governments would do such a thing if they thought they could get away with it, but we're a little ways off from that scenario with this paper is my point.
The amount of antigens and other vaccine components needed to accomplish what people are claiming is practically impossible to make in quantities that would be needed.
What this article is talking about is a nasal spray vaccine. Which has to be give directly into the nostril for it to work. It's simply impossible to get enough antigens in the open air in order to inoculate people that way.
I think people are getting a bit carried away with this one. There are plenty of real issues going on that are legitimate cause for concern. We don't need to go out of our way to find things to get upset about.
What concerns me about this is that we're going to see more and more of these nasal spray vaccines for childhood immunizations.That eliminates the number one reason why most normies are against vaccines. They simply don't trust shots and will think the nasal vaccines are safe(r).
They don't need to go through all these elaborate scenarios where they're secretly trying to vaccinate everyone by spraying vaccines in the air when all they need to do is make the general public believe vaccines are safe. And they're doing that by taking away the top reason people are against them.
the amount of mrna need to blanket an area to get adequate inoculation would be likely pretty high. even chemical weapons have problems being effective in enclosed spaces, nevermind the open air.
Devil's Advocate here, while I share the concern he has, he is extrapolating a bit here. from the bit of context of the paper he gives, it sounds like this is more of an inhalable vaccination administered nasally rather than some sort of vaccine bomb dropped on a city.
There's no doubt in my mind that governments would do such a thing if they thought they could get away with it, but we're a little ways off from that scenario with this paper is my point.
The amount of antigens and other vaccine components needed to accomplish what people are claiming is practically impossible to make in quantities that would be needed.
What this article is talking about is a nasal spray vaccine. Which has to be give directly into the nostril for it to work. It's simply impossible to get enough antigens in the open air in order to inoculate people that way.
I think people are getting a bit carried away with this one. There are plenty of real issues going on that are legitimate cause for concern. We don't need to go out of our way to find things to get upset about.
What concerns me about this is that we're going to see more and more of these nasal spray vaccines for childhood immunizations.That eliminates the number one reason why most normies are against vaccines. They simply don't trust shots and will think the nasal vaccines are safe(r).
They don't need to go through all these elaborate scenarios where they're secretly trying to vaccinate everyone by spraying vaccines in the air when all they need to do is make the general public believe vaccines are safe. And they're doing that by taking away the top reason people are against them.
good point.
the amount of mrna need to blanket an area to get adequate inoculation would be likely pretty high. even chemical weapons have problems being effective in enclosed spaces, nevermind the open air.