Japan approved 5 different brands of the Covid jab: Pfizer, Moderna, AstraZeneca, Janssen (never deployed), and Novavax.
Pfizer and Moderna are mRNA vaccines, while AstraZeneca is viral vector and Novavax is subunit.
I'm curious of the rate of ill-effects with the viral vector and subunit jabs compared to the mRNA ones. I have two close relatives who both received the Moderna jab and ended up with heart issues. My best friend, however, got the Janssen one, which is viral vector, and to my knowledge has never had any ill-effects resulting from it. This makes me wonder, are the non-mRNA jabs "safer"? I still would not get any of them, though.
But that leads me onto my next point: how pure is your blood? If we consider one's blood tainted by having receiving a Covid jab, this may vary depending on what brand/type you received. Correct me if I'm wrong on this, I'm not fully understanding of the process behind it, but the mRNA jab's purpose is to make your body genetically remember to fight off what you got vaccinated for in the future, right? And subunit and viral vector are more or less similar to standard vaccines, so eventually they should work their way out of your system, but do not change your genetics.
I really would need to see the rates of ill-effects of mRNA Covid jabs vs. non-mRNA jabs, but if it is significantly lower for non-mRNA ones, would we consider people who received those as truly having tainted blood; more so than any given person who has received literally any other non-mRNA vaccine, ever?
Let me ask you this: Would you feel any more comfortable marrying and having children with someone who has had a non-mRNA Covid jab than someone who had an mRNA jab? As a married couple, your money is jointly yours, and dealing with medical expenses as a result of injury due to the Covid jab could add up. But I'm also concerned with what's being passed on to offspring as well. Given how mRNA and non-mRNA vaccines work, I would assume that someone who has had an mRNA Covid jab may be passing on their edited genes and tainted blood to their child--but is this the same for someone who's had a non-mRNA jab? I wouldn't think so, or else they wouldn't need to jab infants with like 20 different vaccines immediately after birth.
At this point who knows what the f... they put in those injections which are not true vaccines, but even true vaccines now become suspect. They have lied to us so much I will never take another vaccine/jab of any type for the rest of my life. I remain "Unvaxxed and Over Taxed". My wife and close family are the same, they listened to me early on.
Japan approved 5 different brands of the Covid jab: Pfizer, Moderna, AstraZeneca, Janssen (never deployed), and Novavax.
Pfizer and Moderna are mRNA vaccines, while AstraZeneca is viral vector and Novavax is subunit.
I'm curious of the rate of ill-effects with the viral vector and subunit jabs compared to the mRNA ones. I have two close relatives who both received the Moderna jab and ended up with heart issues. My best friend, however, got the Janssen one, which is viral vector, and to my knowledge has never had any ill-effects resulting from it. This makes me wonder, are the non-mRNA jabs "safer"? I still would not get any of them, though.
But that leads me onto my next point: how pure is your blood? If we consider one's blood tainted by having receiving a Covid jab, this may vary depending on what brand/type you received. Correct me if I'm wrong on this, I'm not fully understanding of the process behind it, but the mRNA jab's purpose is to make your body genetically remember to fight off what you got vaccinated for in the future, right? And subunit and viral vector are more or less similar to standard vaccines, so eventually they should work their way out of your system, but do not change your genetics.
I really would need to see the rates of ill-effects of mRNA Covid jabs vs. non-mRNA jabs, but if it is significantly lower for non-mRNA ones, would we consider people who received those as truly having tainted blood; more so than any given person who has received literally any other non-mRNA vaccine, ever?
Let me ask you this: Would you feel any more comfortable marrying and having children with someone who has had a non-mRNA Covid jab than someone who had an mRNA jab? As a married couple, your money is jointly yours, and dealing with medical expenses as a result of injury due to the Covid jab could add up. But I'm also concerned with what's being passed on to offspring as well. Given how mRNA and non-mRNA vaccines work, I would assume that someone who has had an mRNA Covid jab may be passing on their edited genes and tainted blood to their child--but is this the same for someone who's had a non-mRNA jab? I wouldn't think so, or else they wouldn't need to jab infants with like 20 different vaccines immediately after birth.
At this point who knows what the f... they put in those injections which are not true vaccines, but even true vaccines now become suspect. They have lied to us so much I will never take another vaccine/jab of any type for the rest of my life. I remain "Unvaxxed and Over Taxed". My wife and close family are the same, they listened to me early on.