Inconvenient truths about the fires burning in Los Angeles from two fire experts
For years, renowned fire experts Jack Cohen and Stephen Pyne have tried to shift the conversation on fire prevention strategies. This week’s destruction, they say, could have been minimized.
among other things, they found nano aluminum oxide had been sprayed over L.A. in the days before the fires. The purpose of this was to increase the burning temperature and destructiveness of the fires.
Around the same time I noticed the normally unwatered grass was turning yellow and not growing like it would normally grow every two weeks in a city close by the los angeles airport which is in the same county as the fires.
that's very interesting and highly suggestive something was indeed going on at the time... thanks for sharing.
...ditos...
https://youtu.be/puwoUKhZQbg?si=FyqNaILSIcuYRov-
Sand dries things up because its an absorbant. It soaks the moisture out of living things. The aluminum oxide was soaking the moisture out of the vegetation so it would burn faster and hotter. Kind of like throwing sand on your driveway to to soak up spilled oil, gas, water etc...
that might have been how they explained it. I was taking written notes on a radio interview and I might have confused the roles of the silver iodide and aluminum oxide.
Isn't salt in sand? If so, the sand would be an absorbent attracting water and drying cells up of whatever it comes into contact with.
Sand is thrown on oil and gas spills (petro) all the time.
The source for the claim is that the intel group operating under the 'Juan O Savin' moniker has said in interviews that they conducted air and water samples over the past week in the L.A. basin, and that they found two things of interest.
One was the nano aluminum oxide that I mentioned, the other was silver iodide. They believed these substances to have been sprayed by military aircraft flying out of Area 51 in Nevada and radar returns from just before the fires do show flights from there into southern California.
The silver iodide, they speculate, was to dry out the leaves and branches of trees to make them more combustible once set afire. They theorize the aluminum oxide (which they said was in a nano powder form, not sure how that would serve a purpose) was to make the fire hotter and more difficult to extinguish.
I'm not a chemistry guy and I don't put much stock on radio interviews by people claiming to have inside information... yet this particular group, which has started to publish, has in the past demonstrated a pretty close connection to Trump and the Mar-a-Lago crowd. As to how aluminum oxide would further the efforts of arsonists, I don't know other than how I see aluminum acting in my own kitchen (how aluminum pans get super hot very quickly, before they cool - also quickly). Firefighters on the scene did remark how the fires seemed to burn hotter than they are accustomed to and didn't respond as well to being fought with water.
There needs to be more independent, open-source testing of air, water and soil in the areas subject to chemtrailing. I'm glad the Juan O Savin group shared their information but it needs to be out there in a format that is more easily verified and accepted.
I'm dismayed that a U.S. military facility like Area 51 would play a part in an event like this. It raises the question of whether that facility is still rogue and opposed to patriots (as Eisenhower felt it was even back in the 1950s) or whether the silver/aluminum spraying they did saved the area from some greater threat and the fires were just an unfortunate side effect they had to accept. Fort Huachuca similarly has a lot of troubling questions around it.
...excellent addendum, nicely stated...