I have a difficult time understanding why the companies would be allowed, or even desire to continue contaminating a product with an ingredient officially determined to be a cause of cancer. It would seem any person who suffered damage from the product after the company was put on notice would have a valid cause of action against that company. At the least, shouldn't they be required to immediately include a notice of potential harm on the product label. Have we reached the point where a known harmful substance can be included in a food product just to make it more attractive to unsuspecting consumers. I suppose the next time we have a salmonella outbreak we will give the responsible party two years to get the product off the market.
I have a difficult time understanding why the companies would be allowed, or even desire to continue contaminating a product with an ingredient officially determined to be a cause of cancer. It would seem any person who suffered damage from the product after the company was put on notice would have a valid cause of action against that company. At the least, shouldn't they be required to immediately include a notice of potential harm on the product label. Have we reached the point where a known harmful substance can be included in a food product just to make it more attractive to unsuspecting consumers. I suppose the next time we have a salmonella outbreak we will give the responsible party two years to get the product off the market.