I wonder why Lady Linsey questioned Kavanaugh about this case during confirmation ?
Johnson v. Eisentrager, 339 U.S. 763 (1950)
"We hold that the Constitution does not confer a right of personal security or an immunity from military trial and punishment upon an alien enemy engaged in the hostile service of a government at war with the United States."
"...It is not for us to say whether these prisoners were or were not guilty of a war crime, or whether if we were to retry the case we would agree to the findings of fact or the application of the laws of war made by the Military Commission. The petition shows that these prisoners were formally accused of violating the laws of war and fully informed of particulars of these charges."
Mass murder is a state crime too. He's phooked.
Hope we get justice anyway. Does this pardon cover his AIDs “projects” too.
Only question is how hard .
I wonder why Lady Linsey questioned Kavanaugh about this case during confirmation ?
Johnson v. Eisentrager, 339 U.S. 763 (1950)
"We hold that the Constitution does not confer a right of personal security or an immunity from military trial and punishment upon an alien enemy engaged in the hostile service of a government at war with the United States."
"...It is not for us to say whether these prisoners were or were not guilty of a war crime, or whether if we were to retry the case we would agree to the findings of fact or the application of the laws of war made by the Military Commission. The petition shows that these prisoners were formally accused of violating the laws of war and fully informed of particulars of these charges."