Thank you for showing discernment. The number of people that fell for the tranny pilot hoax is staggering. Not just here, but most of my friends/family. RIP CWO Eaves.
There was a third person onboard according to all accounts I have seen.
Some sources: three military aboard: one male w 1000 hours, one male and one female with 500 hours. The males have been named. YES WHO was the third person?!? Obv they know!
Although they used a PAT call sign, it is called a training mission for using night vision devices, not a priority person being transported. [Did they recover night vision devices with the bodies?]
Why train with night vision devices in a busy dangerous air corridor?? Why then?? Do they usually do those training runs for night vision in this corridor at this time? Why not 2am? [Haven't heard anyone ask that question either.]
Obviously flying visual is hampered by wearing night vision devices!! Limited peripheral vision, distorted "view" of the scene . . .
Yes they need to train on that . . . but in a busy corridor, dangerous already, where the tower is known to be understaffed??
Are they actually training to take out an enemy aircraft under night vision conditions, by flying in a busy city with lots of lights and lots of air traffic?
So they are basically training to take down an innocent plane b/c they cannot distinguish what they are actually seeing to know it is an enemy they have in their sights / sight?? Who authorized this training mission? etc. etc.
Thank you for showing discernment. The number of people that fell for the tranny pilot hoax is staggering. Not just here, but most of my friends/family. RIP CWO Eaves.
There are 2 pilots. This was one of them.
Pilot, co-pilot and crew chief on a Black Hawk.
Friend of mine, former CWO3 with over 20 years flying a Blackhawk evac sent me this a few minutes ago: https://www.newsweek.com/washington-dc-plane-crash-jo-ellis-trans-helicopter-pilot-wrongly-named-2024149
Co-pilot is listed as a woman.
Yep. But they haven't released her name yet for some reason. Unless she is really a he.
True. What's odd is they have also released the name of the crew chief. He was Ryan O’Hara from Georgia. The airline pilot was also from Georgia.
https://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/dc-plane-crash-victim-helicopter-army-b2689466.html
I wouldn't place a lot in where these people came from unless some glaring pattern emerges.
500 hours, but not her name although the men were named??
I just posted this. May be BS: https://x.com/Angelhunter1776/status/1885237095570034689
There was a third person onboard according to all accounts I have seen.
Some sources: three military aboard: one male w 1000 hours, one male and one female with 500 hours. The males have been named. YES WHO was the third person?!? Obv they know!
Although they used a PAT call sign, it is called a training mission for using night vision devices, not a priority person being transported. [Did they recover night vision devices with the bodies?]
Why train with night vision devices in a busy dangerous air corridor?? Why then?? Do they usually do those training runs for night vision in this corridor at this time? Why not 2am? [Haven't heard anyone ask that question either.]
Obviously flying visual is hampered by wearing night vision devices!! Limited peripheral vision, distorted "view" of the scene . . .
Yes they need to train on that . . . but in a busy corridor, dangerous already, where the tower is known to be understaffed??
Are they actually training to take out an enemy aircraft under night vision conditions, by flying in a busy city with lots of lights and lots of air traffic?
So they are basically training to take down an innocent plane b/c they cannot distinguish what they are actually seeing to know it is an enemy they have in their sights / sight?? Who authorized this training mission? etc. etc.