Thanks for clarification. I don't particularly care about what's allowed to be discussed on the site, keep the "fringiest" of things at conspiracies.win. if it can be tied to a Q drop I think that's all that matters, since that is what this win is for. And of course, the great community here.
You got it, fren! This is exactly what we're aiming for. The problem with the fringiest of things is that they just end up going around in circles and spinning wheels. You can spend days trying to prove something that just isn't true. It's a time sponge that will produce no useful results. There are plenty of good rabbit holes to go down, so why waste time on something that, in the end, is inconsequential to the Q mission?
As so much of Q is in code, how do you know exactly what has been said by Q and what hasn't?
In addition it's the expression that matters. Q2622 says the earth isn't flat. I wouldn't have asked Q if it was flat, I would have asked if it is a globe and the answer may well have still been, 'No'. It's clear that Q answered the question they wanted to answer, but that doesn't mean we aren't supposed to dig. It could be a hint that FE is wrong, but that another shape is the truth. Or is could be misdirect... we simply don't know and nor do you.
Most of us don't want to go round in circles, but unless people dig, you don't know if a topic is a spinning wheel or revelation. Knowledge is evolving as people whistleblow or docs are unearthed and that will continue for some time to come. Q4734 is obvs against gatekeeping which is still a big feature in our lives mostly here now, where we should be able to set up frenly digs that are voluntary. When these things are no longer banned on X and FB, anon are able to post info there, but not here? Puzzlement.
And _censorship install
Thanks for clarification. I don't particularly care about what's allowed to be discussed on the site, keep the "fringiest" of things at conspiracies.win. if it can be tied to a Q drop I think that's all that matters, since that is what this win is for. And of course, the great community here.
You got it, fren! This is exactly what we're aiming for. The problem with the fringiest of things is that they just end up going around in circles and spinning wheels. You can spend days trying to prove something that just isn't true. It's a time sponge that will produce no useful results. There are plenty of good rabbit holes to go down, so why waste time on something that, in the end, is inconsequential to the Q mission?
Yeah, I totally agree with that.
As so much of Q is in code, how do you know exactly what has been said by Q and what hasn't?
In addition it's the expression that matters. Q2622 says the earth isn't flat. I wouldn't have asked Q if it was flat, I would have asked if it is a globe and the answer may well have still been, 'No'. It's clear that Q answered the question they wanted to answer, but that doesn't mean we aren't supposed to dig. It could be a hint that FE is wrong, but that another shape is the truth. Or is could be misdirect... we simply don't know and nor do you.
Most of us don't want to go round in circles, but unless people dig, you don't know if a topic is a spinning wheel or revelation. Knowledge is evolving as people whistleblow or docs are unearthed and that will continue for some time to come. Q4734 is obvs against gatekeeping which is still a big feature in our lives mostly here now, where we should be able to set up frenly digs that are voluntary. When these things are no longer banned on X and FB, anon are able to post info there, but not here? Puzzlement.