You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (24)
sorted by:
▲
4
▼
–
PopTartGun
4 points
ago
+4 / -0
- The contract becomes void if perpetrated in fraud and with nondisclosure. The executive branch can nullify the contract by proving no consent. No consent means no contract. The district judges act as magistrates enforcing their orders pursuant to the Uniform Commercial Code (maritime/admiralty law) and under color of The United States Constitution (Supreme Law of the Land). SCOTUS has appellate jurisdiction over maritime/admiralty law subject matters like contracts with the acknowledgement of The Constitution being supreme pursuant to Article III, Section 2, Paragraphs 1-2 and Article VI, Paragraph 2.
- Can the judiciary branch usurp the powers of the legislative branch by subjecting the executive branch to orders under color of law? The legal precedent of Marbury v. Madison, 5 US 137 states an emphatic NO: "A law repugnant to the Constitution is void." The activist judges enforce their orders or injunctions as quasi-laws in violation of their oaths as Article III judges and Article VI.
permalink
save
report
block
reply