For Example: Steven Cook, fined in 2014 for implying colloidal silver could cure cancer, a case brought by Essex Trading Standards. He was fined although there have been many studies including This one that confirm colloidal silver does in fact have potential for anti-tumor activity. Keeping in mind this was done to him utilizing the 1939 Cancer Act.
The act predates the formation of the National Health Service (NHS) by nearly a decade, reflecting early efforts to standardize cancer care. According to Cancer Research UK, it was designed to protect patients from fraudulent treatments, a common issue at the time, by regulating how treatments could be advertised to the public.
This made the care of cancer patients limited to what [certain people] and doctors deemed correct. -think, why not Royal Rife, other avenues of treatment we're just now finding out about today. Think when and who - Rockefeller and how he took away the ability for "other" doctors to treat. -it's in depth and it's a read but if you look hard enough you'll bog through the bullshit that they want you to think it was, so far as a good thing, and see it for what it was. Pure Evil
many thanks for your confirmation and for the link. I try my best to get it right, but I don't always. I'd dug into this and read and re-read it and it seems very different on the surface as opposed to how it was then utilized in a much different fashion. -much appreciated ChessNotCheckers' , cheers 🍻
It was a law restricting making claims of something as a cure within advertising. They didn’t make curing cancer illegal. That’s some clickbait shit right there. Could have left that clearly bogus claim out and still made some good points.
Indeed. I hope they not only do away with advertisements here in the US but also start allowing alternative medicine(s) as well as treatments i.e. synchronous vibration for cellular apoptosis as well as more knowledge being released on Rife machines (Royal Rife- the tech is already here) - one more would be the intelligence/treatments (not the botched studies released on him- but HIS VERSION of what to use and how much) of Dr. Burzinski -he's been dogged and damn near buried by the FDA for decades -and that's with MANY survivors going to bat for him in court.
1939 CANCER ACT — Illegal to cure CANCER💊
Passed by Parliament in England.
This was also being applied by the U.S. Now
Did you know that under the 1939 Cancer Act, it's actually a criminal offense for medical practitioners to even advise patients on potential cancer cures?
I know what this act looks like and what it's supposed to do but dig deeper and you'll see what I'm talking about. "regulate" being key. not just what they allow you to see. - This is part of the "how to control a population's health / treatment starts.
For Example: Steven Cook, fined in 2014 for implying colloidal silver could cure cancer, a case brought by Essex Trading Standards. He was fined although there have been many studies including This one that confirm colloidal silver does in fact have potential for anti-tumor activity. Keeping in mind this was done to him utilizing the 1939 Cancer Act.
WTF?
The act predates the formation of the National Health Service (NHS) by nearly a decade, reflecting early efforts to standardize cancer care. According to Cancer Research UK, it was designed to protect patients from fraudulent treatments, a common issue at the time, by regulating how treatments could be advertised to the public.
This made the care of cancer patients limited to what [certain people] and doctors deemed correct. -think, why not Royal Rife, other avenues of treatment we're just now finding out about today. Think when and who - Rockefeller and how he took away the ability for "other" doctors to treat. -it's in depth and it's a read but if you look hard enough you'll bog through the bullshit that they want you to think it was, so far as a good thing, and see it for what it was. Pure Evil
As crazy as it sounds, this seems to be a real thing. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cancer_Act_1939
many thanks for your confirmation and for the link. I try my best to get it right, but I don't always. I'd dug into this and read and re-read it and it seems very different on the surface as opposed to how it was then utilized in a much different fashion. -much appreciated ChessNotCheckers' , cheers 🍻
Okay folks I have been in this game a long time and yet still I'm amazed at how evil they are this shit is actually new to me,
Just remember no matter how much you hate them you don't hate them enough because they want you as perpetual slaves
Misleading.
It was a law restricting making claims of something as a cure within advertising. They didn’t make curing cancer illegal. That’s some clickbait shit right there. Could have left that clearly bogus claim out and still made some good points.
Controlling language controls the mind.
Bobby should have a field day with this info.
Indeed. I hope they not only do away with advertisements here in the US but also start allowing alternative medicine(s) as well as treatments i.e. synchronous vibration for cellular apoptosis as well as more knowledge being released on Rife machines (Royal Rife- the tech is already here) - one more would be the intelligence/treatments (not the botched studies released on him- but HIS VERSION of what to use and how much) of Dr. Burzinski -he's been dogged and damn near buried by the FDA for decades -and that's with MANY survivors going to bat for him in court.
1939 CANCER ACT — Illegal to cure CANCER💊 Passed by Parliament in England. This was also being applied by the U.S. Now Did you know that under the 1939 Cancer Act, it's actually a criminal offense for medical practitioners to even advise patients on potential cancer cures?
I know what this act looks like and what it's supposed to do but dig deeper and you'll see what I'm talking about. "regulate" being key. not just what they allow you to see. - This is part of the "how to control a population's health / treatment starts.
EXTRAORDINARY Post TI!! ✨👏
thank you much JD' 🍻
🥂