Another remedy people have forgotten is Quo Warranto. The common law writ of quo warranto has been suppressed at the federal level in the United States, and deprecated at the state level, but remains a right under the Ninth Amendment which was understood and presumed by the Founders, and which affords the only judicial remedy for violations of the Constitution by public officials and agents. A critical key to achieving federal constitutional compliance is to resurrect quo warranto and other common law writs. This involves reasserting and strengthening the original All-Writs Act and repealing or declaring unconstitutional legislation, such as the Anti-Injunction Act, and those Rules of Judicial Procedure, that have restricted the jurisdiction of federal courts to accept petitions for these writs and grant a fair hearing ("oyer") and a decision on the merits ("terminer") on such petitions.
Quo warranto - the legal term for a writ (order) used to challenge another's right to either public or corporate office or challenge the legality of a corporation's charter. When the authority of an offical or corporation to take action is challenged, a quo warranto action may be used to demand that the right upon which they base the action be stated.
Why is this important to you? Because Quo Warranto, like Jury Nullification, is one of the most powerful remedies available to the people against government abuses of power.
Writ of Prohibition - "Prohibition is a process by which a superior court prevents an inferior court or tribunal possessing judicial or quasi-judicial powers from exceeding it's jurisdiction in matters over which it has cognizance or usurping matters not within it's jurisdiction to hear or determine. A means of restraint on judicial personnel or bodies to prevent usurpation of judicial power, and it's essential function is to confine inferior courts to their proper jurisdiction and to prevent them from acting without or in excess of their jurisdiction; it is preventive in nature rather than corrective." - Black Law Dictionary Sixth Edition id 842
Another remedy people have forgotten is Quo Warranto. The common law writ of quo warranto has been suppressed at the federal level in the United States, and deprecated at the state level, but remains a right under the Ninth Amendment which was understood and presumed by the Founders, and which affords the only judicial remedy for violations of the Constitution by public officials and agents. A critical key to achieving federal constitutional compliance is to resurrect quo warranto and other common law writs. This involves reasserting and strengthening the original All-Writs Act and repealing or declaring unconstitutional legislation, such as the Anti-Injunction Act, and those Rules of Judicial Procedure, that have restricted the jurisdiction of federal courts to accept petitions for these writs and grant a fair hearing ("oyer") and a decision on the merits ("terminer") on such petitions.
Quo warranto - the legal term for a writ (order) used to challenge another's right to either public or corporate office or challenge the legality of a corporation's charter. When the authority of an offical or corporation to take action is challenged, a quo warranto action may be used to demand that the right upon which they base the action be stated.
Why is this important to you? Because Quo Warranto, like Jury Nullification, is one of the most powerful remedies available to the people against government abuses of power.
Here is one good resource citing numerous cases of Quo Warranto: https://constitution.org/1-Law/uslaw/q-w_cases.htm
There is also:
Writ of Prohibition - "Prohibition is a process by which a superior court prevents an inferior court or tribunal possessing judicial or quasi-judicial powers from exceeding it's jurisdiction in matters over which it has cognizance or usurping matters not within it's jurisdiction to hear or determine. A means of restraint on judicial personnel or bodies to prevent usurpation of judicial power, and it's essential function is to confine inferior courts to their proper jurisdiction and to prevent them from acting without or in excess of their jurisdiction; it is preventive in nature rather than corrective." - Black Law Dictionary Sixth Edition id 842
Thank you so much for this.