It's annoying, yes, but by the same token, if it were a despotic liberal in the White House trampling on rights (e.g., imposing vaccine mandates), wouldn't you want the courts to be able to stop him/her?
You always have to look at things in the light of "if the roles were reversed."
It's annoying, yes, but by the same token, if it were a despotic liberal in the White House trampling on rights (e.g., imposing vaccine mandates), wouldn't you want the courts to be able to stop him/her?
You always have to look at things in the light of "if the roles were reversed."
Not equal. Vaccine mandates aren't in the constitution. Trumps executive powers are as are the judiciaries.