250 Years Ago Alexander Hamilton Told Us How to Handle These Anti-Trump Judges
(www.thegatewaypundit.com)
Comments (13)
sorted by:
In Federalist No. 78, one of the most influential documents pertaining to the role of the judiciary in the then-proposed Constitution, Hamilton wrote that the courts “have neither FORCE nor WILL, but merely judgment” and cannot effectuate those judgments on its own.
I fully agree, President Trump should simply ignore these low level functionaries and carry on with what he needs to do.
Good ole Joe showed us how it's done. Just ignore the judges. Thanks, Joe!
Hamilton as secretary of the treasury got us involved in the rothchild bank. The end of that 20 year contract and our refusal to sign back up started the war of 1812. It ended in 1816 when we re-signed with the rothchild bank. Hamilton was a rothchild agent whose real last name was Levine. Smoke that for awhile.
Alexander Hamilton’s last name was not Levine. His full name was Alexander Hamilton. His father was James Hamilton, a Scottish trader, and his mother was Rachel Faucette, of French Huguenot and British descent. There is no historical evidence that his surname was ever Levine.
Fake name bud
Just cuz i called out somethinf that was fake?
Hamilton is not my favorite Constitution signer. He argued for weak centralized Constitution until it was ratified and after that he bastardized it, just like himself.
Although I concur with that view, there is something sinister laying underneath it. And that is the potential of the judiciary to, fueled by dark money, to create the swell that compels those in the executive, to accept the authority of the judgement as a license to act in contravention of 18 USC 241/242.
Indeed, it is the laws that regulate the duties of citizens that become the issue. For why? Because judges, lawyers, politicians in general all went to the same schools, are members of the same clubs.
Hamiltonian idealism is shown to be failing when compared to practice. Why? Because of the degradation of virtue. And what degrades virtue better than elastic money printed by a central bank. ....
The men who founded our Republic never intended for the judicial branch to have any control over the delegated powers of either of the other 2 branches.
“You seem ... to consider the judges as the ultimate arbiters of all constitutional questions; a very dangerous doctrine indeed, and one which would place us under the despotism of an oligarchy... The Constitution has erected no such single tribunal.” ~ Thomas Jefferson (1743-1826), US Founding Father, drafted the Declaration of Independence, 3rd US President
“[N]othing in the Constitution has given [the judiciary] a right to decide for the Executive, more than to the executive to decide for them. Both magistracies are equally independent in the sphere of action assigned to them… the opinion which gives to the judges the right to decide what laws are constitutional, and what are not, not only for themselves in their own sphere of action, but for the Legislature & Executive also, in their spheres, would make the judiciary a despotic branch.” ~ Thomas Jefferson (1743-1826), US Founding Father, drafted the Declaration of Independence, 3rd US President Letter to Mrs. John Adams, September, 1804
“The province of the Court is solely to decide on the rights of individuals... . Questions, in their nature political or which are, by the Constitution and laws, submitted to the Executive, can never be made in this court.” ~ John Marshall (1755-1835) US Supreme Court Chief Justice Marbury v. Madison, February 23, 1803
“Constitutions are violated, and it would be absurd to expect the federal government to enforce the Constitution against itself. If the very federal judges the Constitution was partly intended to restrain were the ones exclusively charged with enforcing it, then “America possesses only the effigy of a Constitution.” The states, the very constituents of the Union, had to do the enforcing.” ~ John Taylor (1753-1824) usually called John Taylor of Caroline, served in the Virginia House of Delegates, US Senator, writer, political pamphleteer c. 1790
“If it be asked, What is the most sacred duty and the greatest source of our security in a Republic? The answer would be, An inviolable respect for the Constitution and Laws.” ~ Alexander Hamilton (1757-1804) American statesman, Secretary of the Treasury Essay in the American Daily Advertiser, August 28, 1794
The court wasnt judge over the lawmakers. To ensure theblaws were constitutional. The voter is also the jurer and nullification is a thing. We the people are supposed to have the final say. Remember, the constitution is how we control the three branches. Not them controlling us.
Make Assholes Birds Again