Well yes, that was the substance of my original question. There was a longish discussion about judges in general, but you're right, it really didn't answer the question: If judges cannot issue restraints on a President, how does this particular case differ? ...even though it seems to be pro-Trump?
Well yes, that was the substance of my original question. There was a longish discussion about judges in general, but you're right, it really didn't answer the question: If judges cannot issue restraints on a President, how does this particular case differ? ...even though it seems to be pro-Trump?