Why is Bondi’s DOJ still prosecuting a pistol brace owner?
(www.americanthinker.com)
Comments (6)
sorted by:
HEADLINE NEWS ----- STOP THE PRESSES
Nothing stops child trafficking like prosecuting pistol braces.
.... and releasing headlines about it.
"Nothing stops child trafficking like prosecuting pistol braces.
.... and releasing headlines about it."
"here's to the new boss...
...the same as the old boss"
...carry on Patriot...
I can only guess that perhaps Bondi and other Cabinet members are sort of lying low, not scaring some of the mid level bad actors, and waiting for the signal to erupt with shock and awe.
That's what I am hoping, anyway.
Nah, she’s behind Trump’s bump stock ban and loves red flag laws.
Question, would not prosecuting this case be another chance to futher restrain governmental power via the courts?
The fundamental issue in the article is that the ATF can still concoct legal "theories" to prosecute items it previously rendered as illegal, despite the rules codifying it as such being invalidated by the courts.
Wouldn't you have to establish judicial precedent for some hypothetical next time, whether the ATF or some other alphabet agency, by prosecuting this case and attempting a judgement against the Govt? I understand it's kind of barbaric to seriously risk the fate of the defendant to the whims of black robed dictats, but it may very well be best to attempt this under a friendly administration, not a hostile one.
"Question, would not prosecuting this case be another chance to futher restrain governmental power via the courts?"
...valid observation, nicely stated...