Jim Rickards is sounding the alarm on what he’s calling the “greatest cover-up in American financial history.” According to Rickards, a $150 trillion “national trust” as he calls it—hidden for over 160 years—could soon be unlocked, thanks to a quiet but pivotal Supreme Court decision.
(www.globenewswire.com)
🧐 Research Wanted 🤔
The entire monetary and legal system's basis is fictional - dead - unreal. All based on "corporations" (orating corpses), i.e. "USA, Inc.". Thus, a fiction can only generate more fictions - fiat currency, U.S. citizens, artificial persons, residents, taxpayers, drivers, defendants, plaintiffs. All fictions.
Gold is money, everything else is credit (debt) - J.P. Morgan.
A real and true contract is based on 6 basic elements, the one missing in the fiat system is "awareness". As in, the brainwashed masses are not aware of the essence of the contract, deliberately withheld by the fictional entity on the other side (USA, Inc. - Federal Reserve). In short, there is not truly a "meeting of the minds". The yield/coupon is not really what it appears to be in relation to inflation (legal theft) and fraudulent CPI figures generated by those on the other side of the contract. It's all an illusion.
We could even go one step further in regards to contracts, by investigating whose "mind" -- like exactly - the mind of another man or woman, are you meeting with? You're not, right? It's your mind on one side, meeting with a fictional entity. Thus, no "meeting of the minds" if you want to be extra strict about the definition of a valid contract. There is no man or woman on the other side that could ever be "in breach of contract" with you. Thus, there's no actual contract, only a fictional one.
The way the legal system makes it work, is they have to turn you, a man/woman into a fictional entity in order to deal with their fictional entity. So "contractually", you are LEGALLY, but unlawfully converted, into something like an "investor" or a "buyer" or "creditor" or "tenant in common" or "lienholder" or "registrant" or "taxpayer", etc. You can be a million fictional things in their contracts, but never a man/woman - something "real".
Effectively, the contract is also a "fictional entity". As in the legal system. As in, Tom Smith, -acting as the honorary judge Smith in the course of a legal proceeding. Tom is a "real man" for most of his life, but when "acting as judge", he is something else - a fictional entity - a BAR judge - a totally made up entity. And in his capacity, he's required to uphold the fictional over the real if the parties involved don't understand how the system works.
And we're not meant to understand any of this. This is their "game". This is the "matrix" in a very real sense.
They could pull the plug on all of it tomorrow and there's not a thing anybody could do about it. FedBux, Treasuries, bonds, etc. all literally just pieces of paper in an instant!
In one sense, that would restore the power to the people and the realm of the "real" in short order. But there would be immense chaos as the masses slowly came to terms with the fictional realm they'd been enmeshed in all their lives.
I understand this but a contract is a contract.
Did each one of us sign the contract for national debt? I didn’t sign anything and if I did as above comment stated who was I making the agreement with?
Between?