Since they won't say who's making the medical determination to deny care, there's no way to confirm an actual M.D. did the review.
If a 'no name' is saying 'no' to a medical decision your M.D. just made, they must also be a M.D. right? If 'no name' is an actual M.D. then 'no name' must have a medical license, right? If 'no name' has a license the state has a record of it, right?
I wonder what would happen if the family filed a medical malpractice lawsuit UnitedHealthcare, claiming UH was practicing medicine without a license?
The discovery phase could get rather interesting ...
Since they won't say who's making the medical determination to deny care, there's no way to confirm an actual M.D. did the review.
If a 'no name' is saying 'no' to a medical decision your M.D. just made, they must also be a M.D. right? If 'no name' is an actual M.D. then 'no name' must have a medical license, right? If 'no name' has a license the state has a record of it, right?
I wonder what would happen if the family filed a medical malpractice lawsuit UnitedHealthcare, claiming UH was practicing medicine without a license?
The discovery phase could get rather interesting ...
Oh I bet. I am betting an XRP that it's not an MD making that decision.