I wouldn't. Technology has to be maintained. That means it has to be understood thoroughly and earned. Take one look at Zimbabwe to see what used to be a thriving breadbasket region of the world. Take one look at South Africa to see what used to be a first world nation economically. Now, neither place can reliably keep the lights on. They have the infrastructure. It was in place and working at one point when control of those societies was transferred. Those who received it couldn't maintain it.
If you put all people and countries at par technologically, the question then becomes what par? The only par that could be maintained by all groups would put us all back in the stone age, and I would not force that choice on others simply to accommodate those who are unprepared, unwilling, or otherwise incapable of living in an advanced society.
I wouldn't. Technology has to be maintained. That means it has to be understood thoroughly and earned. Take one look at Zimbabwe to see what used to be a thriving breadbasket region of the world. Take one look at South Africa to see what used to be a first world nation economically. Now, neither place can reliably keep the lights on. They have the infrastructure. It was in place and working at one point when control of those societies was transferred. Those who received it couldn't maintain it.
If you put all people and countries at par technologically, the question then becomes what par? The only par that could be maintained by all groups would put us all back in the stone age, and I would not force that choice on others simply to accommodate those who are unprepared, unwilling, or otherwise incapable of living in an advanced society.