It never ceases to amaze me how narrow minded some people can be, Alcohol and/or drug induced impairments kill more people every year than any other crime. If an officer takes an impaired driver off the street it is likely that they saved someone's life. It is a case of "if you buy the ticket you should take the ride." If you don't want to get arrested for driving under the influence then don't drink alcohol,or ingest drugs and then drive.
Marijuana, cocaine and pharmaceuticals may no odors, but they all show physical signs of their presence and they all impair your motor skills. It is this impairment that causes the arrest, not the substance itself. A blood test will determine the substance later.
Wow! What makes you think that smell is the only factor that causes the arrest. The fact is that smell has little,or nothing to do with the actual arrest, All those substances do impair your motor skills. The degree of motor skill impairment is what causes the arrest and driving impaired from any of the above substances is in actual fact driving under the influence.
Don't take the field sobriety or breathalyzer tests. You have the right not to incriminate yourself. Just politely refuse. You may still be arrested and lose your licenses but they'll have to prove you were intoxicated.
Field sobriety tests are not designed to get you arrested, They simply measure the degree of impairment of the driver. If the driver is impaired then the officer has no discretion and must arrest. The place to fight the arrest is in the court and not on the street.
If you fail the roadside sobriety tests, indicating that you are impaired, but the PAS breath test records no blood alcohol level, the California Vehicle Code assumes that drugs or medications have caused the impairment and qualifies for must take offense.The arresting officer has no discretion in the matter. The court is the place to fight this battle, Not the street.
In California DUI is not a "may take" crime. It is a "must take" crime. That means that police must make the arrest, if roadside sobriety tests determine that the detainee is intoxicated or if roadside sobriety tests are refused and therefore can't be administered at all and police aren't able to determine blood alcohol level in any other way, then the assumption must be made that the person detained and refusing or unable to complete the tests,the detainee is again assumed to be intoxicated and must be arrested.
Refuse in San Diego you get a DUI automatically !
Wa state too
It never ceases to amaze me how narrow minded some people can be, Alcohol and/or drug induced impairments kill more people every year than any other crime. If an officer takes an impaired driver off the street it is likely that they saved someone's life. It is a case of "if you buy the ticket you should take the ride." If you don't want to get arrested for driving under the influence then don't drink alcohol,or ingest drugs and then drive.
Marijuana, pills, cocaine, etc don't smell. So they aren't high or DUI? You should reach a law class
Marijuana, cocaine and pharmaceuticals may no odors, but they all show physical signs of their presence and they all impair your motor skills. It is this impairment that causes the arrest, not the substance itself. A blood test will determine the substance later.
Weed don't smell?.....go to NYC and tell me that
Wow! What makes you think that smell is the only factor that causes the arrest. The fact is that smell has little,or nothing to do with the actual arrest, All those substances do impair your motor skills. The degree of motor skill impairment is what causes the arrest and driving impaired from any of the above substances is in actual fact driving under the influence.
Don't take the field sobriety or breathalyzer tests. You have the right not to incriminate yourself. Just politely refuse. You may still be arrested and lose your licenses but they'll have to prove you were intoxicated.
Field sobriety tests are not designed to get you arrested, They simply measure the degree of impairment of the driver. If the driver is impaired then the officer has no discretion and must arrest. The place to fight the arrest is in the court and not on the street.
If you fail the roadside sobriety tests, indicating that you are impaired, but the PAS breath test records no blood alcohol level, the California Vehicle Code assumes that drugs or medications have caused the impairment and qualifies for must take offense.The arresting officer has no discretion in the matter. The court is the place to fight this battle, Not the street.
Didn't watch the video. But a breathalyzer only measures alcohol.
This is why I say
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xB2DY1Q74oQ
In California DUI is not a "may take" crime. It is a "must take" crime. That means that police must make the arrest, if roadside sobriety tests determine that the detainee is intoxicated or if roadside sobriety tests are refused and therefore can't be administered at all and police aren't able to determine blood alcohol level in any other way, then the assumption must be made that the person detained and refusing or unable to complete the tests,the detainee is again assumed to be intoxicated and must be arrested.
No mention of MADD in video.