You know, I was just about at the point of forgiving this guy. "He was probably sitting at a bar, had one too many, built up a little false bravado and decided he was going to give the secretary a piece of his mind..." No one really harmed or fouled by what transpired. But then he goes and makes it all about what the other guy did. Senator, if you would just own up to your half of the story, people could (and would) respect that and let-it-go. But no... you go here instead.
Why is it so hard for some to see (and freely admit) where they've gone wrong?
Does he really think this approach is going to make him look any better?
You know, I was just about at the point of forgiving this guy. "He was probably sitting at a bar, had one too many, built up a little false bravado and decided he was going to give the secretary a piece of his mind..." No one really harmed or fouled by what transpired. But then he goes and makes it all about what the other guy did. Senator, if you would just own up to your half of the story, people could (and would) respect that and let-it-go. But no... you go here instead.
Why is it so hard for some to see (and freely admit) where they've gone wrong? Does he really think this approach is going to make him look any better?