Note:
There seems to be some misunderstanding around this post. I'm not suggesting any of these child predators will go unpunished.
Quite the contrary.
The entire premise of this post is to suggest, as Q clearly insinuated, that the amount of pedo DECLAS is likely to leave many wanting.
(See Q3974 & Q27 below)
Justice can and will be served without everything single they did being made public.
When you don't understand someone's actions, you do not know their true motives (plan).
I sense some big, hidden wild card around this whole topic.
One big question is "OK, so Epstein trafficked a bunch of children for sex… Then WHERE the fuck did the children go... what happened to them AFTER"?
⬆️ I think the answer to that question is the biggest thing holding everything up because if the answer to that question is something that society at large COULD NOT recover from, then what?
Were children used as food AFTER?
You can't have (complete) pedo DECLAS without having "they were eating those children" DECLAS. Get it?
Apparently the magnitude of this is lost on many.
Q27: "... BUT NOT AT A COST WE CAN'T RECOVER FROM."
Q29: "Some things must remain classified to the very end."
Think about it a little...
u/#q27
u/#q3974
u/#q29
5:5?
"Every man takes the limits of his own field of vision for the limits of the world." ~Arthur Schopenhauer
Q778: "THE WORLD IS NOT HOW YOU VIEW IT."
Edit:
Sorry to put such a fine point on it but Q clearly told us there are things that we will want disclosed that would never be (fully) disclosed.
Is it this particular topic? I don't know.
But public disclosure of the consumption of missing children as food would cause a societal meltdown, not an awakening.
It does not take a genius to understand this.
Edit #2:
I did not expect such a RAW post to be stickied.
There's a lot of people that have a strong emotional attachment to this topic, and I can understand that.
I was not very nice in this OP, but emotions cloud judgment. There is some things that will never be disclosed... and IF it is this topic, then we're all going to have to find a way to live with it, unfortunately.
Did anyone ever figure out what Q meant when he emphasized (several times) "GAME THEORY"?
Here it is:
https://greatawakening.win/p/19BZpisjdW/judge-joe-brown-believes-that-tr/c/
You will not understand the connection above unless you understand Game Theory.
GAME THEORY in 50 seconds
If you disagree with the post, go To settings and set "community styling" to off and come on back and give me a downvote.
Hi MilesRider.
Putting an end to human/child trafficking and executing those that were known to have participated in it is already being done behind the scenes.
Q said most things would take place behind-the-scenes. "public v private."
Keeping it "classified to the very end" does not in any way mean letting it continue, nor allowing evil to go unpunished.
If the "eating of kidnapped children" where ever disclosed, The American people would not stop until we elected a president who campaigned on "nuking those countries that knew/allowed it to happen."
Do [they] deserve it?
Yeah.
Could it (turning 20+ countries into radioactive glass parking lots) also inevitably trigger the downfall/reset of humanity?
You bet.
And on top of that, 99% of the people that would die initially in that sort of scenario would be innocent citizens of corrupt governments.
Q said "no one escapes this."
Q3974 "It will be your choice whether to know." And then Q proceeded to link 'pedovore' code talk.
I just don't see how Q could have made it any more crystal clear.
"It will be your choice whether to know."
Our choice to know what Q?
(This is not directed at you MilesRider but it is appropriate for some...)
"I can explain it to you, but I cannot understand it for you."
u/#q3974
It cannot be made any more clear.
That is opacity, imo. I understand it but I don't believe this interpretation is plausible.
Fair.
But imo, you underestimate how fucking furious (and politically determined) the parents of hundreds of thousands (millions?) of never-found children would be if it was disclosed, officially, that major govs & monarchies knew & facilitated those atrocities.
But since we're talking and I do value other's insights, what is your interpretation of Q3974 "it will be your choice whether to know" accompanied by pedovore code talk?
Which part is implausible?
I think you're underestimating how furious we will be if evidence of their crimes remains covered up. Q didn't come to the normies, he came to us. This is because while normies are powerless sheep, anons are, in many ways, very powerful. It's not going to be good for anyone to have all of us stewing and thinking justice still needs to be served.
They need to be exposed, everything they've done. Humanity will simply have to come to terms with the results of their hideous prolonged apathy without collapsing because the only possible outcome arising from keeping their secrets is for it to all happen again.
Those are good points.
And I do think 'a lot' of pedo things will be disclosed… But considering Q27 & 3974, I think some are going to be left wanting.
Q clearly implied as much.
An anon said almost those exact words to Q.
He did not seem moved.
There was a time when my sentiment was the same as your own u/Wexit-Delecto.
u/#q27 u/#q3974
🤷♂️ 🤷♂️ 🤷♂️ 🤷♂️ 🤷♂️
When the "SKY EVENT" & "Ascension" happen, perhaps a lot of paradigms are going to change in way we can't imagine.