I just did. Again, I'm not an attorney but my father was and I grew up around legal language quite a bit. It seems to me the US code part 1 on crimes, with the following chapters in particular, all have language that seem to fit what we've seen from those who conspired to unseat President Trump. I could be totally wrong because the law often hinges on the meaning of one word or a phrase, but I just don't see how what they've done could only be considered fraud.
Chapter 19: conspiracy,
Chapter 47: fraud and false statements, and
Chapter 215: Treason, sedition, and subversive activities.
I don't think they can do anything, UNLESS, the sealed indictments are unsealed. They were dated in the past, so shouldn't be affected by prosecutorial time constraints. I was excited when this all came out, but am less so now. I want them strung up, but I have doubts with what I currently see.
18 U.S. Code Part I - CRIMES
Look for yourself.
I just did. Again, I'm not an attorney but my father was and I grew up around legal language quite a bit. It seems to me the US code part 1 on crimes, with the following chapters in particular, all have language that seem to fit what we've seen from those who conspired to unseat President Trump. I could be totally wrong because the law often hinges on the meaning of one word or a phrase, but I just don't see how what they've done could only be considered fraud.
Chapter 19: conspiracy,
Chapter 47: fraud and false statements, and
Chapter 215: Treason, sedition, and subversive activities.
I don't think they can do anything, UNLESS, the sealed indictments are unsealed. They were dated in the past, so shouldn't be affected by prosecutorial time constraints. I was excited when this all came out, but am less so now. I want them strung up, but I have doubts with what I currently see.