Fair. Saying Trump is vindicated by Ghislane is like saying Trump was never vindicated. He's innocent, but this kinda stuff doesn't work in our favor at all. I'd prefer it the other way, where she condemns him but defends the Clintons. At least that would align with her evil.
All I got now are people that associate Trump's innocence with the Clintons'. Whose bright idea was it to talk to her anyway?
Why are you believing anything a literal convicted child rapist says?
Fair. Saying Trump is vindicated by Ghislane is like saying Trump was never vindicated. He's innocent, but this kinda stuff doesn't work in our favor at all. I'd prefer it the other way, where she condemns him but defends the Clintons. At least that would align with her evil.
All I got now are people that associate Trump's innocence with the Clintons'. Whose bright idea was it to talk to her anyway?