The Shooting of Charlie Kirk on Amazon already. Note Publish Date (listing was pulled shortly after this screenshot) AJ showed a printed version on his show today
(media.greatawakening.win)
🚔 Crime & Democrats 💸
The author’s name doesn’t show in amazon kindle now.
u/DRan with his big eyes got it archived in time here: https://greatawakening.win/p/1AR0Gqih8v/x/c/4eWbTXI2ND1
Nice!
A search for the book appears with an ISBN-13 number.
https://isbnsearch.org/isbn/9798264842788
ISBN-13: 9798264842788
According to Grok, registering an ISBN number can registered almost instantly.
https://x.com/i/grok?conversation=1966377961675989424
search for the book also brings this entry:
https://bookscouter.com/book/9798264842788-the-shooting-of-charlie-kirk-a-comprehensive-account-of-the-?type=sell
Where the 'Released Date' is Sept. 11.
Question: If the book is self-published on Amazon, is it possible that the Author/publisher can simply fill-in the 'publication date' as a data entry field? As opposed to this being a field that Amazon auto-fills when something is 'published' or made available to Amazon?
If yes, then the published could simply have mistakenly or purposely entered Sept 9 as the publishing date, which would (in fact has) generated a massive amount of exposure and publicity.
Hmmm...
EDIT: Ding!
Grok:
OK. I think the controversy can be resolved:
a) the author rush-published the book in digital form. Whether the content was AI written, or the author wrote it, (possibly had already planned a Charlie Kirk book and then pivoted that research and writing into this publication due to unfolding events), that requires more research.
b) when the author/publisher registered the book with ISBN, obtaining an ISBN number instantly, they accidentally or purposely back-dated the publication date to September 9.
c) the book appeared on Amazon, September 11, after the assassination/murder, but with the back-dated publication date, generated massive curiosity, suspicion, etc, feeding into confirmation biases, generating this level of publicity.
This seems to be an extremely plausible possibility. It could easily be done, but of course, questions remain:
How did the author/publisher get this book up to printable status so quickly? (although note, its apparently only 68 pages!)
What was the motivation for publishing so quickly?
Given the Sept. 9 'publication date', which is apparently provided by the publisher when registering the book with ISBN, why did they choose that date? Was it a mistaken, or on purpose? If on purpose, then why?
u/Fatality
I think this was a rush publish, 68 pages as you mentioned, the date of sep 9 might have been on purpose in order to generate interest. Pulling it immediately was probably the realization that the author might get landed on a sus list.