If all the world's collective MAINSTREAM information is what's fed into AI, what would you expect it to spit out?
I played with ChatGPT a couple years ago when it first came out. I was interested in what it had to say about DNM and Dr. Hamer. I asked probably a dozen questions until i noticed it kept concluding its answer to my question with the following sentence -> "Nobody has ever proven Dr. Hamer's theories to be correct".
That sentence is "the truth" as per the cabal establishment's wishes. So ChatGPT wasn't "lying". It was doing the best it could with the "approved sources" programmed into it.
It's important to note in that answer, that "nobody" in that sentence means "establishment institutions and authorities" of course. Another slick little sleight-of-hand in that answer. Because millions of people have "proved Dr. Hamer's theories correct" over the past 40 years. But none of them work within the cabal's medical establishment of course. They aren't allowed to work within it. Further, everybody working within it is not allowed to talk about Dr. Hamer's theories either, if they wish to keep their job and not get sued out the wazoo of course. All the establishment doctors can do is stick to the cabal-generated "standard of care"....which is basically 100% wrong of course.
Anyway, after seeing that response a couple times, I asked ChatGPT the question it wasn't ready for -> "Has anybody ever even ATTEMPTED to prove or disprove Dr. Hamer's theories?"
ChatGPT spun for a good 3-4 minutes before replying "I am unable to find any information about attempts to test Dr. Hamer's theories."
That pretty much says it all right there. A "truthful answer" on the surface, but a massive lie in truth. Not ChatGPT's fault. It just spit out the garbage from "approved sources" that was fed into it.
I will say, I've used ChatGPT and a few other AI engines to write some documents, which it does a fabulous job at I might add. They are much better writers than me!
In the end, AI will be used for good and bad, just like everything else in this world - technology, guns, information, etc.
I was interested in what it had to say about DNM and Dr. Hamer...* testing it to see what facts it had*
If you truely had faith in "... that one fact is "I AM" " you would realize that there are many facts but your natural healthy skepticism keeps you from going all in on things in order to remain from free of error. With out error there is no leaning for your "KNOWING" the "I AM"
If you were were DaVinici + Elon +Dr Hamer + all information in ALL large language models you would still know "very, very, very FEW "facts in this" existence. We have to go all in with what we have. In order to get what we need.
Is AI captured as well ?
AI is GIGO - Garbage In, Garbage Out.
If all the world's collective MAINSTREAM information is what's fed into AI, what would you expect it to spit out?
I played with ChatGPT a couple years ago when it first came out. I was interested in what it had to say about DNM and Dr. Hamer. I asked probably a dozen questions until i noticed it kept concluding its answer to my question with the following sentence -> "Nobody has ever proven Dr. Hamer's theories to be correct".
That sentence is "the truth" as per the cabal establishment's wishes. So ChatGPT wasn't "lying". It was doing the best it could with the "approved sources" programmed into it.
It's important to note in that answer, that "nobody" in that sentence means "establishment institutions and authorities" of course. Another slick little sleight-of-hand in that answer. Because millions of people have "proved Dr. Hamer's theories correct" over the past 40 years. But none of them work within the cabal's medical establishment of course. They aren't allowed to work within it. Further, everybody working within it is not allowed to talk about Dr. Hamer's theories either, if they wish to keep their job and not get sued out the wazoo of course. All the establishment doctors can do is stick to the cabal-generated "standard of care"....which is basically 100% wrong of course.
Anyway, after seeing that response a couple times, I asked ChatGPT the question it wasn't ready for -> "Has anybody ever even ATTEMPTED to prove or disprove Dr. Hamer's theories?"
ChatGPT spun for a good 3-4 minutes before replying "I am unable to find any information about attempts to test Dr. Hamer's theories."
That pretty much says it all right there. A "truthful answer" on the surface, but a massive lie in truth. Not ChatGPT's fault. It just spit out the garbage from "approved sources" that was fed into it.
I will say, I've used ChatGPT and a few other AI engines to write some documents, which it does a fabulous job at I might add. They are much better writers than me!
In the end, AI will be used for good and bad, just like everything else in this world - technology, guns, information, etc.
If you truely had faith in "... that one fact is "I AM" " you would realize that there are many facts but your natural healthy skepticism keeps you from going all in on things in order to remain from free of error. With out error there is no leaning for your "KNOWING" the "I AM"
If you were were DaVinici + Elon +Dr Hamer + all information in ALL large language models you would still know "very, very, very FEW "facts in this" existence. We have to go all in with what we have. In order to get what we need.
Can you name one other fact, that's true for everybody since time immemorial and forevermore?