I picked up a few haters here that I now own.
They have nothing meaningful to offer, and I'm an easy target because I speak in very definitive terms.

See #1 and #2 of Tactical Discussion Framework.
https://files.catbox.moe/mh2spy.png
I'm only responding here because he is in violation of #2 "misrepresentation."

For instance magavoices accused me of saying 'the white hats killed Charlie Kirk' on my "Shot heard around the world" post even though I directly addressed that before he ever typed it.

If popular opinion on GAW was in line with his nonsense, I would never get more than a dozen up votes on anything I post… And therefore would stop posting.
That's the "free market" model in action.
Bad "product" = no upvotes.

He makes things up in his head that are completely contrary to the words that I write.
This is evident by simply reading my posts/comments.

So it's either very poor reading comprehension skills…
OR
He's a simple shill/hater that deliberately distorts what I say because he has nothing of any real value to offer to GAW.

I tend to think it's the latter because it's supported by lack of any compelling or interesting post/comment history... and honestly no one could be that stupid that consistently.